Insight Bowl Provided Glimpses Of What Sooner Defense Could Have Been
I have to start by asking myself and everyone else this question. Is it possible that as fans we were so frustrated and disenfranchised with Oklahoma's defensive performances this season that its difficult to give credit under any circumstances. The rumors of Mike Stoops possibly returning to the staff don't help out the situation either.
These thoughts kept going through my head as I was willing to light up Brent Venables once again and overly criticize Oklahoma's defensive performance against Iowa. However, after looking it over and settling down a bit I've come to the conclusion that the defensive performance by the Sooners last Friday night wasn't bad at all. In fact, its the kind of performance we had hoped they would have delivered throughout the season and if they had we wouldn't have been watching the Insight Bowl.
Everything started up front for Oklahoma's defense and the line didn't disappoint. Perhaps it was the new attitude instilled by Bob Stoops laying down the law where some players were actually playing for their scholarships. Maybe it was the time off leading up to the bowl game that allowed some of the players to get their legs underneath them or better prepare for their opponent. Whatever the reason, Oklahoma's defensive line helped pave the way for a performance that shutout the Hawkeye's for three quarters and held them to less than a hundred rushing yards. Of Oklahoma's 8 tackles for loss 5.5 of them came at the hands of the defensive line. Defensive end R.J. Washington had two of the team's three sacks and the unit combined for a total of 19 tackles.
Behind the line Oklahoma's linebackers had one of their most impressive performances in a long while, if not the entire season. They accounted for the rest of the tackles for loss and Travis Lewis had the other sack. He and Tom Wort accounted for 10 total tackles with Wort also picking up an interception. Corey Nelson added another three tackles. The linebackers had good pursuit angles and limited the Iowa rushing attack as the defensive line occupied blockers.
In the secondary Jamell Fleming had a fantastic game. He finished the game tied for a team high seven tackles but more importantly was a blanket that covered Marvin McNutt and held Iowa's top receiver to just four receptions. That's not to say the secondary didn't have its share of issues and would most likely grade out lower than the other defensive units. Iowa's two scores came through the air and while Hawkeye's quarterback James Vandenberg completed just 52% of his passes he also passed for 216 yards.
I loved the move of Tony Jefferson back to safety. Its more of a natural position for him and if I had a vote he would stay there for the remainder of his Sooner career. He finished tied with Fleming at the top of t he tackle list with 7 and also had a key pass break up.
With all that went wright for the Sooner defense a lot will be made of what went wrong in the fourth quarter when they surrendered 14 points. Were there mistakes in that quarter? Sure were. Did Oklahoma's secondary get beat again in coverage when the quarterback scrambled? Absolutely! However, at the end of the day Oklahoma's defense held Iowa to only those 14 points and that's the type of performances we were hoping to see going into the season.
Some of the success is credited to Iowa's struggles at the running back position but some of it also need to be given to the coaches moving away from a three-man front for most of the game and the players who executed the scheme. Yes, we have to take the good with the bad and there was a lot of good done by Oklahoma's defense last Friday night. As the Sooners proved, even with an anemic offensive attack 14 points isn't too much to overcome.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Defense is the best Offense
I think we just seen what next year will be. Improved defense and a more conservative offense, running more than passing. No problem here with that. I think we relied to much on the passing game and not as much on a power game. Now do not get me wrong I want to pass the ball 25 to 30 times but not 50 a game. Stout defense and a good offense will win the NC. Got to rush the QB more. Just my thoughts.
Boomer Sooner
I do not get the feeling we are going to emphasize the running game....
with the running backs we have on campus in the interest of keeping them healthy.
I'm a Sooner Born and a Sooner Bred, and when I die I'll be a Sooner Dead!!!
I think staying away from the 3 man was huge.
This team is not built for that 3 man front at all. When you use your talent in the way it should be it shows. OU doesn’t have the size on the line or at linebacker to run a 3 man. The few times that they did line up in the 3 man they got gashed. With losing big Frank and the Hammer they will have to stay out of it next year or we’ll get tore up plenty of times.
"I feel sorry for peple who don't drink, when they wake up in the morning thats as good as they are gonna feel all day long." Frank Sinatra
As a whole
I was happy with the performance of the D. That being said, allowing an anemic Iowa offense to score twice in the fourth quarter is unacceptable. That is crunch time. Good defenses don’t allow scores in the fourth quarter…especially to that type of an offense.
Getting rid of the 3-man front was beyond huge, but to credit the coaches with that NOW is a bit much. They should have figured that out after KU or Tech or A&M or Baylor or…you get the point. It’s too little too late in my book.
In my mind, this season was wasted. It was wasted by the players. It was wasted by the coaches. Wasting a season is far more detrimental to a program than just the occasional re-booting/rebuilding blip. This was OU’s Vietnam. Now this program is in a holding pattern of sorts and I don’t know that giving Brent Venables and the defensive staff credit for finally figuring out a season-long malaise versus a terrible offense is something that I’m willing to do.
For OU to ever win #8, this program needs to get back to a successful ground game (I’m talking top 20 in the country) and a junkyard dog defense. With the current tendencies of this staff, I can’t say I’m convinced it will happen. Maybe I’m just very disillusioned after this abortion of a season, but that’s where I am.
The defense was good but it was to be expected
against a team like Iowa and their style of play. Like I said before the game, I like OU’s against any pro style or power rushing offense in the country. If they have played a good spread attack (or maybe a mediocre one) they probably would have been gouged again for at least 40. They just can’t defend it, and that’s a problem in this conference.
This times a million. Iowa had 1 good reciever, there best runningback was suspended and we still gave up 14 points. I’m anxious to see Jordan Phillips play at dt. I’m ready to go back to power football on offensive and a stingy defense. BOOMER!
Love the crimson and cream
by ohiosoonerbaby on Jan 4, 2012 8:42 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
I just don't get why having a fast break offense
And a shutdown defense together is a veritable impossibility.
by SCKSChief on Jan 5, 2012 11:06 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Consistency
That was the problem all year in a nutshell. They look mediocre in the first half against KSU and then play lights out in the 2nd half. And against the spread forget it. I do think our defense is better than how they played a lot of this year. I don’t think the problem is entirely the athletes either. The Big 12 coordinators have had enough time to figure out the holes in our schemes….time to make some changes….somewhere.
"Gentlemen we must all hang together, or assuredly we will all hang separately."
Benjamin Franklin
by leatherneck1061 on Jan 6, 2012 11:32 AM CST reply actions

by 






























