Are Bob Stoops & Mack Brown held to different standards
With the utter lack of pretty much anything resembling news, aside from all the vomit inducing talk about the Longhorn Network, coming out of Big 12 media days we're sadly left with little to discuss for the next 39 days. However following along as I did throughout Monday and Tuesday, I was intrigued by a question that started form in my mind. It's one that I'm sure has been asked before at different times in the heated rivalry between OU and UT, but given the hysteria that seemed to surround the burnt orange contingent in Dallas earlier this week (despite their putrid performance last year) I think it's worth asking again.
Are Bob Stoops and Mack Brown held to different standards. I ask because I'm left to wonder why there appears to be very little criticism of Brown, both from a national and fan perspective, considering the season they're coming off of and my firm belief that things would be much different in Sooner Nation is the situation was reversed. Now before anyone goes flying off the handle, let me say I get that one year does not a coach make. Look, as big of a Texas hater as I am even I can't argue with Brown's track record of success in Austin. One 5-7 season doesn't erase all that success and while I think back-to-back losing seasons would change things for him pretty significantly, we're a long ways from that being a reality since 2011 has yet to even kickoff. That said as I mentioned above and we'll get more into after the jump, I'm quite confident that were their roles reversed things would be quite different amongst both the national media and the respective fan bases.
But before we go any further, understand where this is coming from. I'm not whining about whether or not Stoops has it harder than Mack. That's not what this is about at all, or at least not how I'm intending it to come across. More of a hypothetical for the sake of conversation about how it seems we as OU fans and you as UT fans treat our coaches differently. Ultimately, all that really matters is that each respective fan base is happy with the guy they have in charge so I just ask that you keep that in mind as you go forward.
There is little point in sitting here and rambling off all the relevant stats for each coach, you've all likely heard them countless times before and more to the point this isn't necessarily about who is the better coach. The point that I'm attempting to make, probably poorly, is that here we were at media days and really throughout the entire offseason and hardly anyone is asking Mack the tough questions about their 5-7 season. This is a guy, who like I said before, has had incredible success in the past. Yet for all that success, he's only He seems to still have the same revered standing with both the local and national media alike and for lack of a better word, appears to be getting somewhat of a free pass for last year.
Meanwhile you have a guy like Bob Stoops, who has won seven Big XII championships, played in four BCS MNC games (which no other coach has done by the way), never had a losing season, and yet he repeatedly gets crap from the media and some in Sooner Nation. He'd be the first to tell you he never asked or wanted the "Big Game Bob" moniker, that was bestowed upon him by the same people who rip him for, in their eyes, no longer living up to it. The media. His critics, of which there are many for some reason and who magically appear only when it's convenient, will be quick to point out that his record in this four MNC games is only 1-3. Can't argue that, it is what it is. However, I've never really followed this logic as it's pretty much impossible to win a national championship if you don't play in the game that determines it. So while I, and I suspect he, would welcome any criticism over the USC debacle the other two losses were close, hard fought battles that really could have gone either way. Additionally, it's as if the loss in those games immediately erases the required success they would have had to achieve to even be playing it in the first place. Again, this makes zero sense.
So what I find odd is that you don't hear anyone, and I mean anyone, dubbing Brown "Mail it in Mack" despite the fact that he's only won two conference championships in 13 years. Or the fact that UT has only played in two MNC games under his watch. Or the fact that he's coming off a losing season, which again is something Stoops has never had to do. Or when you consider the resources at his disposal and all the inherent advantages the University of Texas provides and yet how little he's actually accomplished. Yet despite all of that it doesn't seem as if he's receiving very much, if any, criticism from those in the media or UT fans and I'm kind of amazed by this.
So I ask you, would things be different if it were Stoops who had the lesser accomplishments that Mack does? Now again, don't get crazy, as that's not meant to imply that Mack and UT don't win. Clearly that's not the case, but do you put more stock in pure wins or winning your conference? In playing in a bowl game or making a BCS bowl game. I suppose it's in the eye of the beholder, but I'd like to think that even the biggest homer could admit the difference between those things. Take a moment and ask yourself what would things be like if Bob Stoops were coming off a 5-7 season? Would Stoops be under more pressure headed into 2011 than Mack appears to be right now? Again, I say yes. Definitely.
Honestly, I'm not entirely sure why I believe this to be the case. I guess you have to start with who is doing the 'holding' with respect to the "standard." Do OU fans have higher standards that UT fans? I don't really think that's true. Both schools' expectations are high year in and year out and both coaches are expected to win and win big. So do OU fans place a more unrealistic expectation on Stoops than UT fans do on Mack? Perhaps that is the case. Maybe I'm just totally misreading the situation, but I just don't get the sense from Texas fans that they're as upset as I believe OU fans would be. Maybe they're just more calm minded than we are? Or maybe they've just bought into the sales job that Mack feeds them every year (lord knows he can sling it) and this has quieted their criticism?
Regardless, it's a unique question to pose in that it really is dependent on each individual fan's opinion. Now there will almost always be a group of fans (size indeterminate) that shares that same opinion and some will be louder than others, thus garnering more attention, but that rarely means they're opinion is the correct one. At the end of the day, I guess I'm just curious if (1) OU fans agree with me that Stoops would be under more pressure than Mack appears to be and (2) Have I misread how UT fans feel about Mack right now headed into 2011? or I suppose (3) Does anybody really care?
20 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
missread... ugh, i hate to look as if i am siding with Mack (sigh)
Every Texas fan I talk to (I live in Dallas) is livid. They are very interested to see how this season plays out. If another monumental failure occurs then they will be out for blood…
I think what is being lost though is context. In the end Brown was coming off a MNC run and very well may have won had it not been for the injury to McCoy. Obviously he was doing something right just a few months before.
After the debacle much of the blame was laid at the feet of Greg Davis (rightly so, in my opinion) and he gets the boot. In the process Brown’s CEO hypothesis gets shot all to hell. He revamps his staff and starts anew.
He basically short circuited the argument. He in essence admitted he screwed up but at the same time showed that he already had a plan in motion to set things right. Making drastic changes is a far cry from maintain the status quo. If he had done that than i believe Texas fans would still be up in arms.
In my mind if roles were reversed i would have acted in much the same manner as the Texas fans. Bob brought us back form irrelevance so far be it from me to say he can’t do it twice. Mack is getting his second chance, something he has earned and as much grumbling as we Sooners do i still believe we would do the same for Bob (if not, it really is sad commentary on us).
With that said, here’s to Mack going down in flames and giving us plenty to laugh about over the usually ho-hum spring and summer months =]
[raises a glass]
"I want to see if I can hurt some more people. To me, I don't think I'm out there hurting enough people. I should hurt a lot more people than I do. I'd like to hurt someone on every play." The Boz
The something he was doing right was calling Colt McCoy run/pass to Jordan Shipley plays… and then Colt McCoy is taken out of the equation, and it becomes pass to Jordan Shipley.
Jordan Shipley leaves, and there just aren’t any plays left that work.
What's sad is how true this is...
I’d only add that the schedule in 2009 was pretty soft. Arguably their best win was the 3-point margin over an Oklahoma team that was essentially playing with it’s JV offense. Did solidly on the road against Mizzou, OSU and Baylor, but that’s not exactly the true test of champions right there. (I know OSU was ranked highly in ‘09, but c’mon…they didn’t scare anyone.) I won’t deny that there’s a case for the last second 1-point win to give Nebraska it’s 4th loss of the year, but it wasn’t any more impressive than Oklahoma’s 1-point win over Nebraska last year.
i guess I’m saying Texas was clearly a good team in 2009, but its doubtful they were ever really a championship calibre team, and the 1-trick pony offense is pretty much the reason why.
by BigFatScott on Jul 28, 2011 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions
I AGREE WITH YOU
I think its because of all those championships and trips to the NC games that we as fans expect the same quality of play year in and year out
by oiltrsh on Jul 27, 2011 4:12 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
I can see where you're coming from...
…I think I end up disagreeing with you, but not by much.
OU and saxeT are, let’s face it, spoiled. We are spoiled because we’re both elite, premiere, top-notch, cream-of-the-crop, Big Boy programs. In the last Ten years, how many programs have been on the same level of success as these two? I would count Florida, Alabama (and that only recently), Auburn, LSU (I really wish I didn’t have to include them), USC, Ohio State, possibly Oregon, and (honestly!) Boise State. And of this list, how many have had the same head coach over that ten-year period?
It was my impression that most UT fans that I know were more butt-hurt over their season last year than we would have been. I think that they seemed even more angry about Greg Davis during their off year than we were about Kevin Wilson during ours, although we definitely had some. (Interesting side note: both offensive coordinators had just prior to that taken their teams to national championship games. But I tend to think fans have short term memories.)
Also, I think the media generally does a good job of giving both programs the love that they deserve. Yeah, just about every media outlet pays at least one “That Guy,” whose job it is to talk smack that usually accomplishes its goal of whipping fans into a frenzy, thereby driving up web site hits or otherwise generating ad revenue.
(I think there is a conflict of interest for ESPN and Fox News, which serve as both carriers of content and “journalistic” reporting of the content they carry, but that’s a different issue.)
I’ll be honest, I lived in Norman from 1988 through 1999 — the exact years between Barry Switzer and Bob Stoops. So from my perspective, the only thing that could make me say that Stoops needs to go would be major NCAA violations or raping small farm animals. I could even take three or four losing seasons in a row.
But the thing that I love about Bob is that if he had three or four losing seasons in a row, he’d probably resign on his own account, and not because of any grumblings made by fans, boosters, or administrators.
We’ve got one heckuva football coach.
So yeah, I think that saxeT fans are generally whinier than ours, I think the media gives us about equal love, and I’m not too worried about whether we’re treated differently. I don’t think we’ve got much to complain about.
In the immortal words of Socrates, "I drank what?"
Also, in conclusion...
…texas sucks.
In the immortal words of Socrates, "I drank what?"
by SaintSooner on Jul 27, 2011 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
From a Texas perspective
I was so intrigued by this post that I joined your board to reply. I’m a Texas alum who’s lived in New England for the last 15 years. This is God-forsaken country when it comes to football.
First off, Bob Stoops is a hell of a football coach. Let’s just get that out of the way. The debate as framed by all of you above is perfect in the sense that there is a double standard between Mack and Bob BUT the question is how finely do we want or need to analyze the data? As an example, if we base our judgment on wins and after ten years one has 100 and the other has 99…is there a real and meaningful difference?
I think that the real danger in sports (and college football is most representative) is that we get frenzied and throw out the coach in the process. It’s throwing the baby out with the bath water. Nebraska is a great example. They fired a coach in Frank Solich who had come off of a 9-4 record. He’d had three double digit winning seasons in the five prior to being let go. IF you get rid of a coach who is winning 9 or more games a year, who exactly are you going to replace him with who is going to do better?
Before Mack Brown finally won a championship (of anything), I was pretty miffed with his inability to show me he could win a championship. Then, I thought, “gee, who are we going to replace him with who’s gonna win 10 games a year?”. Winning 9+ games and winning a BCS championship may be two different things but I think that there’s very little between them if you coach at a major school. Does Mack get more slack? Yes, probably, but at the same time, they are at differing stages of their careers. Mack has the finish in sight. He won’t be around too much longer whereas Bob has a lot of good coaching left.
That said, there’s also the issue of media bias. I don’t watch ESPN anymore and that’s because I know people who’ve worked there (both in front of and behind the camera) and it’s fairly clear in my mind that they have their own agenda and it isn’t always with “good journalism” in mind. At times, they create news and they railroad anyone who goes against what they want to put out there. Texas and OU fans should consider themselves lucky that we generally have fallen to the good side of that more often than not.
I love to hear college sports fans complain about the whining of others because I have news for you. If you’re from a top athletic school, we ALL whine. Yes, we do. The difference college holds from the pros is that for many of us this is our alma mater (our “nourishing mother”) and we know how we all feel about mama. For some others of us, perhaps we didn’t go to school there but it is a school that represents us and the place we live. Those are bound to bring out the passion in our collective hearts to root for the team. It’s bound to make us more critical and more gloating. It’s going to make us feel ownership which is more ownership than we’ll ever have of our pro teams. Is that right or wrong? I don’t know. It depends on your perspective. You could take any commentary regarding college football and it’s predictable. One school will be in the news. Their fans will gloat or whine. Their main rivals’ fans will kick them when they’re down or tear them down when they are riding high. There will be a back and forth about who the “real” fans are and why “school x” isn’t really all that good. The fact is that we’re swingin’ dead cats at nothin’. You could make a Mad Lib out of those threads and it would sound the same with the names changed.
At the end of the day, Bob Stoops has accomplished a lot. Mack Brown (in my eyes) not as much but both have their programs riding very high and you don’t hear a lot of grumbling about compliance at either school. If you guys ever decide Bob isn’t worth it, you’d better wake up and apologize. A worthy adversary for any college program. Congratulations.
by DreadedOne on Jul 27, 2011 5:53 PM CDT reply actions 2 recs
Thanks for joining our board
We welcome as much discussion as possible from all sides and you’ve brought up some very valid points.
+1000
you’re welcome here anytime
"You see we got another championship banner up? It’s not a South Division one, either." Bob Stoops
Crimson and Cream Machine - There's only one Oklahoma!
Listen to Sooner Nation, the #1 podcast for OU fans
by Jordan Esco on Jul 27, 2011 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions
It's hard for me to compare Mack and Bob
When Bob has never gone 5-7 ad embarrassed OUr program.
Follow on Twitter @LLAdamJ7
by dasoonerman on Jul 27, 2011 6:16 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Fair point
This is true. It’s not just that Mack went 5-7…it’s his stubborn denial of what the problems are and his unwillingness to make needed changes. I don’t ever recall seeing your coach do the same and that’s why when the pro jobs open up…your coach is always on the list.
It also raises the question of what the powers that be will tolerate. I don’t think Mack has as long of a leash as is portrayed but I think he’s literally at the end of the line in any case.
It's just ESPN...
and it’s not Bob vs. Mack. It’s just that ESPN is heavily invested in college football and has absolutely no journalistic integrity*. First, as the Bruce Feldman debacle and so many others demonstrate, they’re happy to ignore objective journalism for a dollar. Second, ESPN makes a lot of dollars on college football, and they make more dollars when they showcase Texas than when they showcase Oklahoma (or practically anyone else). Everyone who works there is fully aware of both of these things. They won’t outright lie to benefit Texas, but they’ll hesitate before pointing out all the warts.
The criticism Bob takes isn’t unfair in the abstract. Oklahoma didn’t just lose 3 title games, they also completely failed to show up for 3 BCS games. Pointing that out is fair. It just seems unfair in contrast to Mack, who avoids much deserved criticism because its good for business. Mack didn’t just go 5-7 last year. He also openly politiced his way into the Rose-Bowl. He went on TV (audio anyway) during a game between other schools to try to politic his way to the detriment of one of the schools playing in the game. He claimed a conference title they didn’t win and put it up on the wall. He admitted to begging a former player to accept a retroactive Heisman that he didn’t win (in one of the biggest landslide votes of all time) because it would be good for the program to have it in the trophy case. That same player, by the way, scored a 6 on a general aptitude test on which a score of 10 is supposed to indicate literacy. in the summer of 2009, after his star defensive player drove his car into a building and then left the scene (purportedly to sleep off his apparent concussion but probably because he was drunk, again), Mack not only declined to meaningfully punish him, he praised his leadership. He’s done any number of things that a true blue-blooded elite program should be ashamed of, but no one is really falling over themselves to point it out because it’s bad for business.
Media members apart from ESPN are pretty even in their treatment of both coaches, and that makes sense because their employer isn’t both heavily invested in subject on which they report and willing to do anything for more money. But, really it has almost nothing to do with Bob or Mack. Mack just coaches at Texas, Bob coaches at Oklahoma not Texas, and ESPN is built on promoting whatever makes it the most money while acting like we’re all just watching sports.
ESPN’s TV deal with Texas makes the mutually beneficial dynamic obvious to anyone who had previously failed to notice, but it was always there. I wish Evernote existed in 2009, because ESPN ran a poll asking: What is your biggest gripe with the BCS? (A) Wrong teams in the title game. (B) Ohio State as an at large selection. © I have no gripe. 48 states and the international zone said Ohio State as an at large selection was their biggest gripe. Texas, of course, said that the Wrong teams were in the title game because Oklahoma was in and Texas wasn’t. The state of Ohio, which couldn’t possibly choose B, actually said that it had no gripe with the BCS that year. Clearly most people were not all that concerned that Oklahoma got the nod over Texas, and yet ESPN did plenty of reporting on the BigXII’s “ridiculous” tie-breaker rule. This had nothing to do with Bob or Mack. It was just business. Unashamedly greedy business, but business.
It’s only going to get worse with the new network, but I’m hoping that it will become so painfully obvious that more fans, including Texas fans, will get wise so we can at least have an intelligent conversation about it.
*I just mean the network. The reporters are a mixed bag.
by BigFatScott on Jul 28, 2011 1:33 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
ESPN..ugh...where to begin
I live ten minutes from ESPN and know several people who’ve worked there in various capacities. ESPN has an agenda. Every day, their “news director” picks five stories that they’re going to push. Anything NY vs. Boston is definitely in no matter what and if it’s baseball or football it’s the top story.
Another great example is the Jason Whitlock fiasco. Jason used to be on “Sports Reporters” but was canned when he wouldn’t go on the show and bash Barry Bonds for using steroids (this was before the BALCO stuff and the evidence came out). Whitlock was being a responsible journalist and Lupica didn’t like it as he was trying to drum up opinion against Bonds. The same thing can happen on just about any popular or polarizing topic.
As for the Mack criticisms above…I buy each and every one you’re selling. He’s shameless in what he’ll do to drum up the exposure. I would point out though that Sergio Kindle may not have been drunk. He has narcolepsy and possibly just fell asleep at the wheel. I won’t condone his leaving the scene but there’s another plausible explanation besides the illegal one.
My take...
its all about the fans, in my opinion OU has more die hard football crazy fans/alums and UT has more T-Shirt/bandwagon fans and entitled/non-interested alums. (If I’m generalizing about yall’s fan base let me know but this seems to be the case) UT routinely sells out DKR when times are good but for over 100K it never gets as loud as Norman or College Station, heck Lubbock gives us a run for our money, but why?
Its not that the acoustics are any worse, or that the humidity or wind hamper crowd noise, its that “good” tickets are expensive and only the rich can really afford them (and the student section needs to be changed but that’s a topic for another day). My 80 years old grandparents on the 50 don’t yell or scream, and neither do most other people around them with a few BIG moment 3rd downs in close games. They feel like they paid their money so they just want to enjoy themselves and deserve to simply be able to watch.
I feel that this exemplifies why Mack has had a “pass” for the last few years. The T-shirt fans just jump on another team, the rich alums just stop coming to the games (did yall see OSU this year) and thus paying attention, and the students simply go the frat parties/6th/Cain and Able’s instead of going to the games.
I also think the timing of Brown/Stoops has a lot to do with it, Bob won his first one in 2001 and so yall’s expectations have been higher, longer; while it took Mack until 2006 to grab his first so our expectations haven’t been as high as long and thus we (and the media) give Mack a bit more slack. Still 2 Big 12 Championships is bad, no matter how you slice it.
by TowerPower on Jul 28, 2011 9:47 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
True, even after all of these years
Obviously, this hasn’t changed since I was at UT in the 80’s. The old fogies get the good seats and the students get marginalized. I have never met an OU fan who wasn’t 1000% die hard. Whenever I wear my Longhorn gear around the country and I run into someone wearing the same…I have an equal chance of them just being a bandwagoner.
You are entirely correct about DKR. Always sold out, rarely do the ears bleed. While I know many die-hard Texas Exes…they are diluted by the bandwagoners. I can’t argue that.
Nitpicky
if you’re going to ask a question, you might want to add a question mark, especially in that title :-)
Stoops receives more criticism not only because he has made it to the BCSCG four times and lost three times, but because his BCS record overall is unimpressive. It took a game against a barely competent UConn for OU to break that losing BCS losing streak.
The big difference between Bob and Mack, as I have said before, is that when Bob has a ‘bad’ season, they go 8-5 and win a bowl. When Mack has a ‘bad’ season, they go 5-7 with the team obviously quitting during games. The one thing I will say about Stoops is that his teams don’t quit when the going gets tough during a season.
As for the BCSCGs OU has played in, I think only the USC game was really bad, and OU was in it early, it just spun out of control. Bad playcalling on one drive cost you the ‘03 game, and too many turnovers and your defense tiring cost you the ’08 game. The ’08 team was the best one I think Stoops has ever had, and it was a shame he wasn’t able to pull that one off.
I do think the media gives Mack a pass because he is more of a salesman and is much chummier with them than Stoops is, and they like people who are accessible and make their jobs easier. Mack is also under less pressure than Stoops because Bob has the interests of a whole state behind him (minus OSU and maybe Tulsa fans). In Texas, texas is one of many D-IA programs (think we’re up to 13 now with the additions of Lamar, texas-San Antonio, and Southwest Texas coming up), so loyalties are diluted among the population a little more. And I should point out that the vast majority of journalists in texas are t-sips, and they’re anxious to blow their own horn, and not criticize Mack.
When it comes to style, yes:

That is one awesome flesh colored suit.

by 































