The Chickens Are Home to Roost
I love a good proverb, metaphor, idiom or figure of speech that adequately describes the current circumstances of life. When I think of "the chickens have come home to roost", I can really think of nothing more than Oklahoma Football at this point.
As per the American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition, "The chickens have come home to roost" means "the consequences of earlier actions are making themselves felt." I would say no other figure of speech, besides random swearing would encapsulate the Sooner season more than this one.
After the jump, I'll make my case as to why the proverbial chickens are indeed home and roosting noisily on the University of Oklahoma campus..
"The consequences of earlier actions are making themselves felt." I'd say this sums up the current state of OU football. There are a number of reasons for this. 1) Bob Stoops' refusal to play anyone other than starters, for any reason, for any amount of time outside of the final 2 minutes of a game...regardless of the score. 2) The abject failure of the coaching staff (in this fan's opinion) to correct glaring issues that have been present for years, plural; this speaks to effort, heart, preparedness, run game scheme and defensive scheme. 3) No accountability for the current coaching staff.
All of these reasons apply, in one way or another, to the entirety of the Sooner program. I think that the most important, yet most easily repairable issue is #1. Bob has got to get youngsters and backups into games in the thick of things. Mop-up duty has done little to nothing for these guys. Drew Allen is a great example of a guy that seemingly has not improved in his time here because he logs about 10 minutes of playing time, per season. This is ridiculous. Guys like Bell and Allen should be in the game for far more time than this so that when Landry melts down (which seems inevitable these days) the squad has a viable back up that could maybe get things back on track. Brandon Williams is another casualty to this short-coming. He needed far more carries in the early going, in the heat of the game, to prepare him for the trial by fire he faced late in the season. This didn't happen and Bob subsequently threw him under the proverbial bus in several press conferences for his inability to hold onto the ball in clutch situations. Newsflash, Bob. Williams hasn't been IN a clutch situation until today. Your fault, coach. This major short-fall of the coaching staff has this team basically in dire straits for the bowl game. OU will be trotting out several untested players into a must-win scenario. This smacks of another serving of Desert Humble Pie for Sooner Nation.
My second issue should also be no secret to the followers of the Crimson and Cream. This team has had all sorts of issues that have carried on from season to season, with all the blame be deflected to the players. The defense seemingly couldn't stop nuns from stealing, yet we utilize the same schemes and have the same guys "making the plans" every week...for years. This seems counter-productive to me. Heck, this seems counter-intuitive. If the problem exists with multiple sets of personnel, surely the problem does not lie with the players, right? This goes well beyond defensive scheme though. The patterns are there of big game meltdowns by the entire team. Not one or two key guys, but everyone in an OU helmet (for one reason or another) is unaware there is a competition going on. This cannot be excused, yet it has been allowed to happen for years. This one also has a fairly direct remedy, but this remedy requires intestinal fortitude at the top of the food chain. There are tough choices to be made to rectify this issue, yet it is not impossible. This issue reflects most poorly on the coaching staff, but there is definitely some level of responsibility with personnel here too.
The last issue is a classic domino effect. It starts with the President, the AD and the boosters and trickles down very quickly to all levels of the coaching staff and eventually to the players themselves. There is absolutely no accountability for the coaching staff. This is not initially the fault of the coaches. That fault lies with President Boren and Athletic Director Joe Castiglione. These two gentlemen MUST take some responsibility for this program and demand more of a coaching staff that has become "fat and happy" to say the least. This team has been embarrassed, nearly annually, by a sub-par opponent and by disturbing margins. This cannot happen if you want to have an elite program. I understand that the two top dogs in Boren and Joe C. have the ultimate responsibility here, but the coaches eventually have to realize that things need to be ratcheted up a notch. Right now, I don't see that happening. This adversely effects the players because they inevitably show the effects of such a situation with performances like we saw this season versus Texas Tech, at Baylor and at Oklahoma State.
None of these things are irreparable, but fixing them has to start somewhere. When will the fixes start? Just like any other problem, the change cannot happen until the problem is admitted and recognized. I don't think anyone associated with this program is willing to admit there is a problem. If that is the case, this could be an agonizing ride for Sooner Nation.
I'm really trying to not be overly negative, but I am very afraid that this program is entering the stall that resulted in the downward spiral for Mack Brown and Texas. Things need to be sorted, and quickly. I have full faith that there are very good football players here, as well as some very astute football minds. The thing is, can any of them get past themselves and their pride to make things happen? I sure hope so.
FanPost are for the voice of the fan and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Crimson and Cream Machine administrators.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The real problem here isn’t the first or second issue you’ve identified, as they are only byproducts of number three, lack of accountability. Accountability will eliminate issues one and two.
Joe C. may or may not need to hold Stoops feet to the fire. Is Stoops the type person that requires that method of motivation? I don’t know, but for the sake of our program I hope not, because that would be the absolute worst case scenario imaginable for the source of our problems.
I do know one thing however, if Stoops would administer top down accountability in his coaching staff and players, it would eliminate most all of our problems. The fear of losing two of the most fundamental needs, resources and employment, is enough to motivate most individuals to perform at their peak level (maslow). The coaching staff and starters should fear (like most of us do) that poor performance may result in demotion or lack of employment. I’m not sure that anyone, players included, have any feeling of insecurity about their position. This breeds complacency and is a can’t-miss recipe for disaster.
The solution? Every person and every player, no matter their position in this program, should be constantly evaluated to determine which of the following two categories they fall into, “part of the problem” or “part of the solution.” Once consistent guidelines and expectations have been set to determine who belongs where and what it takes to maintain a position of good standing in the program, the rest of the problems will magically take care of themselves.
I don’t think getting rid of Stoops (not that you’ve advocated that) is the answer to our problems. There’s nobody out there I would trade Stoops for. I do however believe he needs an entirely different approach to identifying and dealing with issues related to underperformance. I understand he can’t be all things to all people, but part of being a great leader or manager or parent or whatever, is to recognize your shortcomings, expose them, then take the steps necessary to eliminate them. I believe Stoops has failed miserably in this regard. With that being said, I’m still a "Stoops" guy.
I like that view
Of #s 1 and 2 being by-products of #3. I wish I would have thought of it that way…might’ve made the post flow more smoothly.
Good insights too. From my perspective, the only way Stoops needs to get the boot is if he refuses to address the issues. By “address”, I mean FIX. Not just acknowledge and afford lip service, but actually change the way business is done.
We are like minded in that respect.
I believe Stoops deserves an opportunity to address the problems within this program, and if he refuses then let the chips fall where they may. I also don’t want to see a bunch of window dressing and coach speak to appease the masses, I want real change. Now I don’t expect Stoops to address these things publicly, as that would do more harm than good, but “Pride cometh before a fall” (see: mack brown), so let’s hope he recognizes the slippery slope this program is on and makes the necessary changes before we become the next Texas.
And for all those that have been calling for Stoops head and saying we need a coaching change, please keep one thing in mind. With any regime change, you have absolutely no idea what will rise from the ashes. I’m as upset and dissapointed as the next guy, but with Stoops we have a known commodity. Let’s give him an opportunity to fix these problems and move this program forward.
by SoonerGoneEast on Dec 12, 2011 3:13 PM CST up reply actions
That is a fair proposition
I fully believe Stoops should get every chance to fix this mess. I also think there needs to be a specific timeline set by the AD and President to see that it happens.
by SCKSChief on Dec 12, 2011 5:12 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
What kind of timeline are you talking about?
Not trying to be an asshole, just curious as to how this takes shape? Like what kind of benchmarks do you see being reasonable? Is this something that you feel should be released to the fanbase?
Also IMO, criticism of Boren is crazy. He’s the best thing to happen to the university since the wishbone. If football is your only concern, focus on Castiglione.
Those decisions
are obviously above my pay grade. However, I think the administration needs to have something in place with benchmarks.
If it were up to me, Bob would have a year to meet a certain number of them and within 2-3 years, he’d have to check off all of them. I’d start with no more blowouts.
Good write up
I agree with what you and Sge have discuessed so far. Everything up to this point can be corrected without having to completely undo the program. Maybe some personell changes have to be made but a new scheme on D and some common sense on offense will go a long way. Changes have to be made in some way, shape, or form. It’s time for the administration and for Bob Stoops to see that.
"I feel sorry for peple who don't drink, when they wake up in the morning thats as good as they are gonna feel all day long." Frank Sinatra
Outsider view
I understand the desire to not call out players, which leads to more blame being places on the schemes and coaching, but I do think personnel is part of the issue here. Can you name a true difference-maker you’ve had at defensive tackle since Gerald McCoy left? I’m not trying to call out any of your defensive tackles, because I don’t think they are horrible, but I don’t think any of them are special. It is kind of hard to execute well in a scheme when you don’t have the difference-maker that makes that scheme go.
Now, the lack of that player at DT does come back to evaluation, recruiting, and development, and from that standpoint, the coaches are to blame. The lack of a proven RB is also another area where a failure rears its head. I would also say the mental malaise this team went into after losing Broyles for the season is also on the coaches. Say what you want, but looking at your team from the outside, it looked to me like once he went down, they lost their belief in their ability to beat teams with comparable talent. The mental state of the team as a whole is on the coaches, too.
JMO, sure some will come on here and rip me for it, but whatever.
Nah, no ripping on this one from me
You mostly right on the what you wrote and the way things are. Some of use different words but have been saying the same thing.
The one thing being a lot older has going for it, most of us older have seen more CFB than most younger people have seen web pages.
I am surprised you got back on this forum though
The one thing being a lot older has going for it, most of us older have seen more CFB than most younger people have seen web pages.
I don't believe there is a logical argument that we don't have top shelf athletes and players.
A couple of years ago Venerables called out the defense because he felt like nobody was stepping up and making a difference on defense. Although not his intentions, he really through himself and the rest of the defensive staff under the bus. IMO This was more of an indictment on him than it was the players.
by SoonerGoneEast on Dec 15, 2011 9:40 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Agree but you realize McCoy has been gone 2 seasons.
It’s not like it’s been 5 or 7…..
I think there is a lack if glue that holds people together. A bunch of individuals and that’s coaches as well as players.
how about Bob setting up some of those Hug Fest retreats? :-)
The one thing being a lot older has going for it, most of us older have seen more CFB than most younger people have seen web pages.

by 































