Iowa St. @ Oklahoma: Notable Stats
Oklahoma came into this game a heavy favorite. Regardless of all the injuries the Sooners have suffered, OU was a four touchdown favorite. The Iowa St. Cyclones were coming off their biggest win in program history against the then #2 Oklahoma St. Cowboys and were hoping to continue their success in Norman. With great defensive play, the Sooners should have pitched a shutout but the offense was held to just a mere 26 points. Here are some Notable Stats.
The Cyclones offense was unable to sustain a drive longer than 37 yards
The game saw eight turnovers...four for each team
Landry Jones was 30 yards downfield "blocking" for Trey Franks on the reverse. He actually just fell over while Trey Franks had 2 carries for 88 yards, both coming on the reverse plays
Travis Lewis scored a defensive touchdown off an INT only to be called back by a phantom block in the back
Blake Bell has eight touchdowns and is now just one rushing TD behind the mark Dominique Whaley set on the season
Oklahoma failed to score a TD in the 1st, 3rd, and 4th quarters...the Sooners haven't been held scoreless in the 3rd since playing at Florida St.
Jones has not thrown a touchdown pass since the Ryan Broyles Injury and marks the first time in his career he has had consecutive games without one
Memorial Stadium was sold out yet right around 55,000 people showed up at best
Michael Hunnicutt was seen kicking off instead of Patrick O'Hara
Austin Box's family was on the field holding up his jersey for Senior Day as Box would have been a senior this season...emotional day
72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Landry
is pissing me off. Figure it out already, man! If he struggles against OSU, Bell needs to take all the snaps.
The very same who has been allowed to throw twice this season
Come on man, he left a slant behind a guy. It happens. Especially when you get TWO chances to throw the ball.
Perhaps That's Why He's Only Had Two Chances
Neither one of them have been close.
by ccmachine on Nov 28, 2011 1:27 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
That doesn't make much sense
Landry has been way off to the nth power beyond what Bell has shown. Besides, Blake can run. Landry is finally starting to show his true colors now that his wooby is gone. If he can’t get it figured out, it is time to make the team as successful as possible. If that means putting in a Tebow-led UF style of offense, bring it.
Why are we overlooking Drew Allen?
More experience than Bell and has the capability to run in a 6’5 240 frame
I think Drew is just...well...there
I think Bell’s upside, especially running the ball, far exceeds that of Allen.
I don't think it's at all fair to judge a QB after only two passes.
Landy, on the other hand has had three seasons to showcase his talents. The jury is no longer out on this guy, I’m afraid he hit his ceiling early on. Unfortunately, since Bell and Allen have virtually no experience, even in mop up duty, the coaching staff is “all in” on Landry.
by SoonerGoneEast on Nov 28, 2011 6:58 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
The Coaches obviously see something in practice that we have no access to
Brandon Williams has been the same way and that’s why he has been limited…why would we not think Bell is in the same predicament with throwing the ball?
Not arguing
Just becoming irate that Landry still seemingly has no clue. None. Time to take the training wheels off of the Bellmobile if Landry is going to look bad yet again. This program can’t afford a fourth freshman season from Landry Jones next year. He has to figure it out.
What you're missing is that if something happens to Landry
Bell is the 3rd quarterback and would back up Allen
My point is
that I don’t think that will be the case come next season. That is why I want to see what the kid can do in the middle of the field, in a non-short yardage situation. I firmly believe that Bell beats out Allen for the job next year. Besides, Landry is quickly playing himself out of the NFL for this year. He’ll be back. I’m not sure I’m fond of that at this point.
I think there's a good chance that Bell eventually beats out Allen as well
But its clear that at this point he isn’t ready
Yeah it was bad.
But how many incompletions has Landry had in the end zone? And I would rather get those kinks worked out against isu instead of bedlam, which of course has a much softer defense than osu….
by OU JJ on Nov 28, 2011 2:53 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Not to mention they ran a run man route on that play. Stills was the only to run a route so Bell had 0 other options other than to run. They should have slid a tight end into the flat or something to give him another option. Good idea to mix it up bad selection to run a 1 man route.
Love the crimson and cream
by ohiosoonerbaby on Nov 28, 2011 9:46 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
If you go back and look at that interception
You’ll see the most incredible reaction time ever from the interceptor, I think it was maybe Jake Knott? The very instant Bell plants his foot and backs up, the LB instantly gives up on the run and shoots across the end zone into the passing lane. It was actually an uncannily quick decision. I had to watch it about 4 times because of how fast it happened.
I guess Tempe will have to work.
by KratosWasASooner on Nov 28, 2011 4:10 PM CST up reply actions
55,000
What a joke. You mean to tell me that we can’t pack the stadium?
Which is 5k more (at a minimum) then will see bedlam.
And if the weather is half as bad as last Saturday, there might be 40k if it’s a good crowd.
I have been to all the big 12 champ games in KC, & thought 06 was the worst game I had been at lately. Then came Saturday. It was as bad as A&M in 98 (?)… I have had tix 16 years & this last weekend was the worst I can think of. The wind was so bad it literally ripped the hood off a heavy poncho!
by OU JJ on Nov 28, 2011 9:13 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Look,
I get as frustrated with Landry as much as everyone else, and can’t help but want to see what Bell and/or Drew can do. However I firmly believe if he comes back next year we will be a better team than if he doesn’t. We get emotional during a game and end up a little irrational I think.
by OOOU! on Nov 28, 2011 7:04 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Next year will be a "nice" year
2013 I firmly believe is next big chance. Therefore they need to get snaps now & hopefully in 12.
by OU JJ on Nov 28, 2011 8:35 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
This stuff was posted yesterday
The irrational side of me is gone. I’m to the point where I want to know 100% whether he is back or not. Personally, I hope the NFL guys fall for Kiper’s hype and take him in round 1. I’m ready to move on. A guy that can’t complete passes when he has time, is not a QB that will win a title.
Happy Feet Landry
Landry Jones reminds me of Texas’s Chris Simms, he was OU’s best player for several years… all we had to do was put a little pressure on him and he completely caved. He had the same “deer in the headlights” look that Landry has and made the same stupid mistakes. Even after Simms went to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 2003 he kept making stupid mistakes in games. During practice he was perfect, first sign of pressure and there was happy feet Simms.
Just wait and see, Jones won’t improve if he comes back next year. He will not do good in the NFL. He will always have the “happy feet” syndrome. Simms proved it, Jones will put an exclamation point on it.
Your comments about Landry this game are so far off base it isn't funny.
Landry was terrific for much of this game. Watch the great drive at the end of the first quarter that ends with the Bell interception in the end zone. On the previous play, btw, the tight end possibly should have scored.
If you don’t think we have one of the very best qb’s in college football, just watch the next drive to start the 2nd quarter. Orchestrated and executed to perfection. If you don’t get it after watching that, you probably need to look at it again. And remember, this is into the face of a wind gusting 40 to 50 miles an hour and sometimes higher. (Not sure, but they also mentioned some drizzle and it might even have been chilly.) Watch his sense of the pocket, his timing, his accuracy—all under horrendous conditions.
You want to criticize him for lack of touch on a couple of short passes fighting gusts of 40 mph that blew a snap over the kicker’s head? Really? He’d better put some juice on it. You wonder why he threw 40 passes, watch this drive, look at his stats, and see. It was amazing.
The next three drives were excellent as well, including a qb sneak by Landry on drive 1that sure looked like a td on my screen; a beautiful pass for a td to Still on the next one that was dropped. And a great pass to get the team into field goal range with only seconds left on the final drive of the half. By then, the way the D was playing, the game was out of reach.
Couldn't agree more
Landry’s biggest fault is that he comes right after one of the most prolific QB’s Oklahoma has ever recruited. I’m sure there are programs that would kill to have Landry Jones on their squad…I dunno maybe an LSU or Bama team that has a tough time scoring touchdowns that aren’t a product of the defense and the field position those defenses produce time and time again.
That isn't my problem
and I’ve never made hint of it. Please don’t put words in my mouth.
My problem is we’ve seen the same thing from him for THREE YEARS. Three. How many freshman seasons does this guy get?
You're right
THREE YEARS of being one of the top 5 or 10 quarterbacks statistically in the FBS. How awful. (I may be wrong about all 3 years, but stated that to make a point)
Landry makes mistakes, as do we all. His are displayed under the microscope that is the quarterback position at the University of Oklahoma.
Rumor has it that Texas is about to sign a huge corporate sponsorship deal for the Longhorn Network. They just have to decide which brand represents them best: Dyson, Eureka or Hoover.
by It'sTheVoice on Nov 29, 2011 8:14 AM CST up reply actions
That's the cost of playing here
you’re right. However, those numbers (which are good numbers) are artificially high because he essentially throws from a vacuum. There is hardly any pressure on the guy. Give any D1 QB that kind of time and his numbers will be high too. Add to that the fact that OU throws 30-50 times every game and you’re bound to hit on one or two.
He’s a good person. He just isn’t the QB that everybody thought he would be. I also think he’s become complacent because Bob will never allow a true competition for the position while he’s here.
Really with stats like that you would EXPECT more than 1 big title
& more than having title dreams all but gone in October. Fact: numbers can back up anything. You wanna trade kingsbury, Harrell or any of the tech qbs for white or Bradford or Paul Thompson???? Because stats mean little compared to titles.
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 9:56 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Cause those tech guys STATs wise were top 5-10 qbs easily.
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 9:57 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Valid points. No, I wouldn't trade
and I don’t want Doege either (pretty decent stats)
Rumor has it that Texas is about to sign a huge corporate sponsorship deal for the Longhorn Network. They just have to decide which brand represents them best: Dyson, Eureka or Hoover.
by It'sTheVoice on Nov 29, 2011 12:27 PM CST up reply actions
Totally agree
Our fans say this team is entitled? Us fans are the ones that are entitled.
by IBleedCrimsonandCream on Nov 28, 2011 11:28 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Couldn't disagree more.....
The thing is Landry makes the easy stuff hard & continually makes the same decisions he made as a freshman. So we are supposed to be impressed because after an interception, he doesn’t throw 2 incompletions & another interception??? After 3 years of starting I would hope not. My issue is that he has not progressed at all from the fiesta bowl. None. And his style if leadership with zero emotion is not getting it done.
And as for last weekend. The fact that he threw it 44 times into 45 mph winds was ridiculous. The coaches are trying to make he & the receivers believe in each other. He had a rotten game. I know, I was there & do not need the knuckle heads at fx to heap undue praise.
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 7:27 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
And yeah 8 other big 12 teams would want him.
That’s not saying much. Saban would not let him sling it around, do his mistake chances would be much less…
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 7:29 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I'd trade for either one of Baylor's QBs right now
that Florence kid got more out of the offense against Tech than Griffin.
Baylor & osu wouldn't trade & that's it!!!!
What does that say????
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 9:57 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
No that the rest of the league has crap....
3 years ago we had Sam, colt, booger Daniel (as much as I dislike him), reesing, zac Robinson, graham Harrell… Heck of alot of drop off in 3 years.
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 11:21 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
We got used to good qb play across the league.
We also haven’t had a qb start more than 2 years. I think thats why it’s so frustrating that we aren’t seeing a better more improved Landry in 3 years. And I will not apologize for that. The improvement from year 2-3 hasn’t happened like you would expect. Especially considering his play against OSU & Nebraska was on an upswing…
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 11:36 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
You're dead wrong, get your facts straight!
Even though there wasn’t much room for improvement to begin with, he has improved. Stoops and company along with the media told us as much all summer long. Perhaps you should come out from under the rock you’ve been living under and take a look around. If he hadn’t improved, we would be a one or two loss team right now and probably an underdog to OSU. As far as that goes, we could have been faced with the very real possibility of three losses and trip to a lower tiered bowl.
Maintain your credibility, please think before you post.
by SoonerGoneEast on Nov 29, 2011 12:05 PM CST up reply actions
I am a bit confused today.....
Just making sure you are as sarcastic as I am…..
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 12:28 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Wow
Stoops also told us that we were going to get #8. And that Gabe Lynn was looking really, really good. So was Ibiloye, according the coaches. None of those are truths.
Oh yeah, Oklahoma currently IS faced with the very real possibility of a lower-tiered bowl. FYI, Sooners lose to the Pokes and it’s the Alamo versus Washington. Yippee.
What is he gonna say, “Landry really isn’t much better, but we’ll be alright”?
I am hoping that East is basically sarcastically agreeing with us...
:) I am a little punchy this morning…. Lol
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 12:36 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
My bad, sarcasm is how I deal with things that I don't have the patience or energy to argue.
I agree with both of you and don’t really give anyone a punchers chance of proving any of us wrong with hard facts. Landry is a good quarterback in a system designed to his strengths. Nothing more, nothing less.He doesn’t have the “it” factor that you would look for in your QB, that being a combination of unquestioned leadership, top-shelf ability and hyper-competitiveness all rolled in to a heady perfectionist.
I guess that’s asking a lot and maybe, just maybe, it’s asking too much. But with the emotional and financial investment we make to support our Sooners I don’t think it’s a completely unrealistic expectation. After 3 years in a system specifically geared and engineered to guarantee him the greatest chance at success as our QB, I’m a little dissapointed and find myself looking toward the future whether it be Bell or Allen.
by SoonerGoneEast on Nov 29, 2011 1:10 PM CST up reply actions
You may have been at the game, but if you think that his throwing that many times was
ridiculous, you weren’t paying attention. The game plan was excellent. It was a terrific balance of throw and run. They established the run effectively and when passes were open they took them. They used all the weapons, and in spite of the conditions, Landry led three or four drives in a row that put the game away by half time.
Regarding whether he has progresses or not, I would argue that he is vastly improved over last year. And as far as leadership goes, I think that’s clearly in the eye of the beholder. You will never accept that he’s a leader even if he makes plays when the team needs it the most as he did in this game and as he has done in past games. You will always find a way to criticize his play and his leadership, no matter the stats, no matter what the coaches say, no matter what others around the country say, no matter what is evident on the game video.
by soonermusic on Nov 29, 2011 11:57 AM CST up reply actions
Just lil you will always find a reason to defend him. :)
It was ridiculous to throw do much under those conditions. Isu never stopped the run. It was only balanced because the yardage was equal. There were a lot more passing attempts than rushing attempts.
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 12:06 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Ok so the play calls were more equal than I realized.
But that wasn’t even the point. The play calling on Saturdays tends (IMO) to force Landry into some throws that just are unnecessary. That does not help is long term decision making. I should have worded it better. No qb should throw it 40+ times in that weather….. And that’s on the coaches
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 12:14 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Not only were the play calls pretty even, but if you exclude the yardage lost on
the wind blown punt snap, we gained almost 300 yards on the ground. I consider that establishing the running game. There were drives where all they did was run the ball. They lined up with the Millard/RipK package at midfield, 3rd and short and stuffed it down IState’s throat. They ran Clay for two huge runs and a first down getting a first and 10 on the 10 yd line after the big run by Franks. Not to mention all the great carries by BWilliams. In addition to that the qb was able to throw for 250 yards and set up multiple scoring opportunities—some coming when the runs were being defended well. I have to disagree if you think they shouldn’t have done that.
It's a moot point. I think 49+ pass attempts in those conditions were unnecessary.
It’s not something we agree on.
by OU JJ on Nov 29, 2011 1:56 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Jones is pretty damn good
Jones makes some phenomenal throws. Seems like after every game..and I mean every game when people talk stats on these threads.. Many people point out the number of drops. And I’ll speak the blasphemous words… if Bradford was in the same situation as Jones this year would probably have the same results. In fact I’ll go so far as to say that Jones is a better QB than Bradford was when OU was/is behind in the score. Bradford had better playmakers around him: Upperclassmen wideouts, Gresham and Finely, Brown and Murray out of the backfield.. Pedal to the metal tempo. . Jones cuts out the knucklehead plays that are just a few per game (thank God he is no Taylor Martinez) and no one has a critical leg to stand on. Bedsides maybe Barkley, Luck, Wilson and (gulp) Weedon, who would do as well as Jones in this offense?
"Are you gonna do something or just stand there and bleed?"
He does make some incredible throws at times
that are Bradfordesque. The problem with Landry is not his ability, but his consistency, or lack thereof. That for me is the difference between being a good quarterback and a great quarterback.
by SoonerGoneEast on Nov 29, 2011 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
Also have to call "foul" on the comment that Landry "just fell over" while Franks had 2 carries
for 88 yards. Total misrepresentation of what happened: On the second Franks run, Landry had one of the key blocks, in fact I’d say the key block at the line of scrimmage that sprung Franks for 41 yards. It wasn’t a thing of beauty but it was an effective block that allowed Franks to gain the edge.
Speaking of Franks who doesn’t get much love here either, I noticed that each time IState kicked off (twice) they elected to kick away from him, preferring to let Finch return the ball. Hmm….
If only he could figure out how to run
I swear, that boy falls over his own feet more than anyone I’ve ever seen. If he figures that out on the second reverse it’s six beans.
Look again. Franks did not fall over his own feet. He was tripped up by Ikard who was making a block
and couldn’t go around it because BW didn’t make his block down there. If Ikard and Williams are a teensy bit better on the blocking it’s 6 points. But once again Trey Franks gets tripped up by his own teammate and is wrongly accused of falling over his own feet on this site.
He does make some incredible throws at times
that are Bradfordesque. The problem with Landry is not his ability, but his consistency, or lack thereof. That for me is the difference between being a good quarterback and a great quarterback.
by SoonerGoneEast on Nov 29, 2011 12:10 PM CST up reply actions
Location, location, location
This post belonged somewhere else!
by SoonerGoneEast on Nov 29, 2011 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
Yes Landry did have a block on the edge to allow Franks the outside
However if you read the statement that I made…I referenced the 30-yards downfield block Landry attempted and simply fell down allowing the man he intended to block record the tackle on Franks
I read and quoted you accurately. Here it is again:
“He actually just fell over while Trey Franks had 2 carries for 88 yards, both coming on the reverse plays” That makes it sound like he didn’t block. He did. He made a key block.
On the one you mention, he sure did whiff 30 yards downfield and looked a little silly as well, but he was 30 yards downfield trying to make a play, which for the qb in that situation shows plenty of hustle, I think.

by 
































