Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Infuriating Jose Molina

Weekly BCS Briefing: Week Seven

The first official BCS rankings have the Oklahoma Sooners rolling into the number 1 spot.

We are going to have a slightly different format from here on out. Since I no longer need to calculate anything with the official rankings out now, I'll be analyzing what the BCS poll is telling us. For those that are interested, you can read about how the BCS calculations are made here.

The rankings are available, after the jump...

Star-divide

Yellow highlights indicate the number one ranking in each particular poll. Pink/Red highlights indicate teams that would be "automatic BCS Bowl qualifiers" if the season ended today. Light blue highlights indicate teams that would be eligible in the at large pool for the BCS bowl games.

  BCS Harris Poll USA Today Computer Rankings
RK TEAM AVG PVS RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW %
1 Oklahoma .9215 NR 4 2486 .8800 3 1334 .9044 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 .980
2 Oregon .8921 NR 1 2774 .9819 1 1452 .9844 8 9 7 9 8 2 11 .710
3 Boise State .8898 NR 2 2685 .9504 2 1385 .9390 7 6 2 7 7 6 7 .780
4 Auburn .8641 NR 5 2410 .8531 5 1238 .8393 3 2 8 3 5 4 2 .900
5 TCU .8573 NR 3 2516 .8906 4 1300 .8814 5 7 5 6 6 7 5 .800
6 LSU .8245 NR 6 2164 .7660 6 1132 .7675 2 1 1 2 4 8 3 .940
7 Michigan State .7628 NR 8 1964 .6952 8 1037 .7031 4 4 12 4 3 3 4 .890
8 Alabama .6654 NR 7 2092 .7405 7 1085 .7356 12 10 4 11 16 20 15 .520
9 Utah .6540 NR 9 1925 .6814 9 1004 .6807 11 11 6 12 11 12 10 .600
10 Ohio State .5726 NR 10 1761 .6234 10 936 .6346 14 16 14 13 21 14 14 .460
11 Missouri .5491 NR 16 1196 .4234 16 640 .4339 6 5 0 5 2 9 6 .790
12 Stanford .5374 NR 13 1455 .5150 14 689 .4671 10 12 17 10 10 5 9 .630
13 Wisconsin .5335 NR 11 1646 .5827 11 867 .5878 16 18 13 17 19 10 13 .430
14 Oklahoma State .5261 NR 15 1247 .4414 15 659 .4468 9 8 10 8 9 19 8 .690
15 Iowa .4824 NR 12 1511 .5349 12 785 .5322 17 19 9 18 17 15 16 .380
16 Nebraska .4295 NR 14 1322 .4680 13 768 .5207 20 23 16 23 14 16 19 .300
17 Florida State .4267 NR 17 1124 .3979 17 608 .4122 13 15 15 15 18 11 12 .470
18 Arizona .3807 NR 18 1037 .3671 18 494 .3349 15 13 18 16 12 13 18 .440
19 Texas .2214 NR 22 397 .1405 22 256 .1736 18 17 11 25 15 17 20 .350
20 West Virginia .1812 NR 19 663 .2347 19 323 .2190 23 25 22 21 0 0 22 .090
21 South Carolina .1555 NR 21 576 .2039 20 284 .1925 24 22 23 0 24 0 24 .070
22 Kansas State .1422 NR 25 143 .0506 NR 53 .0359 19 14 0 14 13 21 21 .340
23 Arkansas .1302 NR 20 579 .2050 21 274 .1858 28 0 24 0 0 0 0 .000
24 Mississippi State .1253 NR NR 129 .0457 24 133 .0902 21 20 19 19 22 22 17 .240
25 Virginia Tech .0658 NR 23 242 .0857 23 165 .1119 28 0 25 0 0 0 0 .000


Top 25 by Conference

SEC (6), Big 12 (6), Big 10 (4), Pac 10 (3), MWC (2), ACC (2), WAC (1), Big East (1)

None ranked: Sun Belt, MAC, Independents, Conference USA

BCS Qualification Analysis

*All qualification procedures described in quotes will be excerpted from the BCS website.

Championship Game

1. The top two teams in the final BCS Standings (see below) shall play in the National Championship Game.

Well it looks like what I said last week has panned out:

I know a lot of people will look at the edge Boise State has [at number 1] and immediately think that it will be tough to play catch-up. However, history shows that this is entirely possible, and even likely.

Admittedly, I didn't think that edge would be made up in a week, but that was the case when the BCS rankings were released this week. I have a feeling that this would be a match-up that a lot of Sooner fans would like to see so that we could exact revenge for what happened in Eugene a few years ago. Of course, the bigger story here is the national media being unwilling to give OU any credit for being undefeated. I took the following screen capture from ESPN's front page today:

Espnscreenshot_medium

Jordan and Matt had touched on this in the latest Sooner Nation broadcast. According to them, someone on ESPN said that Oklahoma is "not in control of their own destiny". ESPN's BCS Expert Brad Edwards, posted online:

I honestly don't think any team controls its destiny right now. As long as there are several major undefeated teams, I can see any of them getting leaped in the polls by putting together a couple of squeakers against middle-of-the-pack conference competition.

I cannot disagree more. As I pointed out in a post last night, and as people who know their BCS history know, no team that has ever opened up at #1 has fallen from that spot without losing. That is the textbook definition of "being in control of your destiny". The Sooners will be fine as long as there isn't a mass revolt amongst voters and they drop OU to #5-6 despite being undefeated. I don't see that happening, despite the animosity there is towards OU nationally right now.

Now, the problem is whether or not the team can stay undefeated after achieving that #1 ranking. That has been a problem, and only 3 of the last 9 initial #1 teams have managed to stay undefeated. The odds are against the Sooners, and that's because the #1 team always will get everyone's A-game. However, the question of whether or not the Sooners will stay undefeated, and the question of whether or not OU will hold their #1 ranking if they keep winning, are two different questions entirely.

You can argue whether or not Oklahoma is clearly the best team in the country right now, but if Oklahoma wins out and beats Missouri and Oklahoma State, whom the computers value at #6 and #9 respectively, they will easily maintain their #1 ranking. No question. Even if the human voters move an undefeated Auburn or LSU ahead of OU, the substantial edge in the computers would keep them in the top spot. Now, with the #1 ranking in hand, we truly get to find out if the Sooners are worthy over the next 6 weeks - 4 of which they'll be on the road.

And to continue my mini-rant, I'm glad that everyone is saying that OU is undeserving of the #1 ranking. I think that it adds fuel to the fire if people say you don't deserve something, rather than anointing you the best without any questions asked (see: Alabama). It will certainly help OU in tough road games against Missouri and Oklahoma State if they have a chip on their shoulder, rather than riding high with an inflated ego.

BCS Automatic Qualifications

2. The champions of the Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-10, and Southeastern Conferences will have automatic berths in one of the participating bowls through the 2013 regular season.

3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, or the Western Athletic Conference (hereinafter "non-AQ group") will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or

B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls. No more than one such team from the non-AQ group shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: A second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.) If two or more teams from those conferences satisfy the provisions for an automatic berth, then the team with the highest finish in the final BCS Standings will receive the automatic berth, and the remaining team or teams will be considered for at-large selection if it meets the criteria.

Right now, I've just used the highest ranked team in the BCS in each conference as that conference's champion, despite the fact that some other teams are still tied for first place. Here are teams that are still tied for conference leads:

  • Big 12: Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Missouri
  • Big 10: Michigan State, Iowa, Purdue
  • SEC:  LSU, Auburn
  • ACC:  Florida State, Virginia Tech
  • Big East:  West Virginia, Rutgers, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati

You may be asking why TCU is not included in this list as they are from the Mountain West Conference and are ranked in the Top 12 (3, A, above). However, since Boise State is the higher ranked team that isn't from an automatic qualifying conference, they would be the only team that would receive an automatic berth.

The conference races are shaping up. West Virginia looks like the clear front runner in the Big East. The Big East champ has an automatic berth into a BCS Bowl, but they are not tied to a particular bowl game. The ACC front-runner is Florida State, but it looks like Virginia Tech is taking control of the other division. Since the ACC has a championship game, I would consider both teams to be in the lead for the automatic Orange Bowl berth.

Auburn and LSU will be playing to be the big kahuna in the SEC this week. However, the SEC is still up for grabs. Both Auburn and LSU still have to play Alabama. All three of those teams are from the SEC West. No other SEC team has 0 or 1 losses, so if those three teams beat up on each other, then the SEC could be out of the running for the national title game for the first year in awhile.

In the Big 10, I seriously doubt that Purdue will remain undefeated in conference (they are 4-2 overall). They've knocked off Northwestern and Minnesota to start the conference schedule. The Big 10 looks to be coming down to 4 teams, all of which have a legitimate chance to win the conference championship this year - Iowa, Michigan State, Ohio State, and Wisconsin. Iowa is the only team that plays all three of the other contenders, so it isn't a true round robin, but it looks like Iowa will go a long way in determining the Big 10 this year.

At Large Eligible Teams

If there are fewer than 10 automatic qualifiers, then the bowls will select at-large participants to fill the remaining berths. An at-large team is any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible and meets the following requirements:

A. Has won at least nine regular-season games, and

B. Is among the top 14 teams in the final BCS Standings.

No more than two teams from a conference may be selected, regardless of whether they are automatic qualifiers or at-large selections, unless two non-champions from the same conference are ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in the final BCS Standings.

If fewer than 10 teams are eligible for selection, then the Bowls can select as an at-large team any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible, has won at least nine regular-season games and is among the top 18 teams in the final BCS Standings, subject to the two-team limit noted above and also subject to the following: (1) If any conference has two or more teams in the top 14, then two of those teams must be selected, and (2) from the teams ranked 15-18, a bowl can select only a team from a conference that has fewer than two teams in the top 14.

Right now I've struck the requirement to win 9 games, as we are too early in the season to consider that. Right now these are the teams that are essentially in limbo. They are high enough in the rankings that continued good play would merit them consideration as an at large BCS team (of which there are likely to be 3 this year). However, they are also teams that are going to need some help with losses by teams ahead of them.

If The Season Ended Today...

National Championship Game: Oklahoma vs. Oregon 
Rose Bowl: Michigan State vs. Boise State
Sugar Bowl: Auburn vs. Ohio State
Orange Bowl: Florida State vs. LSU
Fiesta Bowl: TCU vs. West Virginia

I'm using the team selection procedures listed on the BCS website. The Fiesta Bowl would lose their automatic tie-in with the Big 12 Conference champion as #1 OU would go to the NCG. The Rose Bowl would lose their automatic tie-in with the Pac 10 Conference champion as #2 Oregon would go to the NCG. Therefore, the Fiesta Bowl would get first dibs at the rest of the at-large pool, and the Rose Bowl would get second crack at it.

Since Auburn is ranked higher in the BCS, we'll "consider them the SEC champ" right now, which would automatically place them in the Sugar Bowl. The same scenario applies for Florida State (ACC, Orange Bowl), and Michigan State (Big 10, Rose Bowl). West Virginia would have to be selected as the Big East champ, and Boise State would have to be selected as the WAC champ by virtue of the procedure described above. Three more at large teams would be selected then. 

The Fiesta Bowl would get first choice. Typically, I think they would take Boise State as they have a long established relationship with that team and fan base. However, because of the following provision, Boise State would be headed to the Rose Bowl:

(For the games in January 2011 through 2014, the first year the Rose Bowl loses a team to the NCG and a team from the non-AQ group is an automatic qualifier, that non-AQ team will play in the Rose Bowl.)

Therefore, I think the Fiesta Bowl would take TCU as its first pick, because they are relatively close, highly ranked, and have a history with the Horned Frogs now. The Rose Bowl's replacement pick would be satisfied by the provision, so then at large bids would be filled in the normal selection order. This year the Sugar would then pick, and I think they would go for a big name program to get a headline matchup - and take Ohio State. Then the Orange would pick, and because of regional considerations, I think they would take the next highest ranked SEC team which would be LSU in this case. The Fiesta Bowl brings up the rear, and West Virginia would need to be selected as the Big East champ.

Now obviously, this will change. Some of these teams will actually be playing each other. Once again, this is not a prediction, this is merely a statement of where I think teams stand at this point.

Comment 47 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Quick and dirty BCS update

Dec 2011 from Barking Carnival - 92 comments

How The Coaches Voted

Dec 2011 from Barking Carnival - 59 comments

Comments

Display:

Random, but

I hate Schlabach.

"In high school they called me the Diesel because I used to run people over. Diesel is like the king of the road. If my football career does not work out, maybe I will be a Diesel model. I have a couple pairs of their shoes." -Adrian Peterson

by OUPest on Oct 18, 2010 1:53 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Here's Schlabach's Preseason Top 10
1. Alabama Crimson Tide
2. Ohio State Buckeyes
3. Boise State Broncos
4. Texas Longhorns
5. Virginia Tech Hokies
6. TCU Horned Frogs
7. Florida Gators
8. Iowa Hawkeyes
9. Nebraska Cornhuskers
10. Oregon Ducks

I’ve bolded the teams that remain undefeated

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Oct 18, 2010 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

+1000000000

"I don't like Texas. I don't like the city of Austin. And I don't like the color orange. It reminds me of puke." The Boz

by Jordan Esco on Oct 18, 2010 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hypothetically

if OU runs the table with wins at Missouri, Oklahoma State, and A&M, and Auburn or LSU, and Oregon run the table, I don’t see enough voters thinking that OU is clearly worse than those other teams. And, in that scenario I think that the computers will make the decision for the humans because they won’t be able to make up their minds about who is #1. Voters in the Harris and Coaches will split up the #1 votes amongst the undefeated major conference teams, and their point totals will wind up being very close in the human polls. Since OU holds a substantial computer advantage right now, I think they have the edge overall.

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Oct 18, 2010 1:59 PM CDT reply actions  

I really dont think that more than 2 teams will be undefeated at the end of the year, but

isn’t the coaches and the Harris poll’s 2/3 of the formula? And didn’t the computers send OU to the NC game vs LSU a few years back? I think Oregon and Auburn have the hardest schedules left (not saying overall, just from here on out), and nobody wants Boise St in a championship game, so I must disagree with espn and say I believe if y’all win out you do indeed control your own destiny. Also, its funny seeing OU feel disrespected by the media. That’s our turf your stepping on.

OSU, running a soft zone since 2004

by AUKingOState on Oct 18, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am watching

College Football Live as we speak and its making me sick to my stomach. They are outraged that we are number 1! I think they are physically sick to their stomach. It makes me sick to my stomach. All they’ve done is complain about how unfair the computers are. I’m thinking well then let’s just throw out the computers and go back to the old school way of determining a national champion. Especially since the influence of money and the media are so much greater these days than they were 20 years ago. That’s alright. These criticisms will just give our Sooners fire. We play our best when we are disrespected. Boomer Sooner!!!

by soonergal5 on Oct 18, 2010 2:09 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

It is seriously like ESPN is on a mission right now

to declare OU the least deserving #1 ever

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Oct 18, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

So its

not just me? I feel like I’m being a giant homer right now but its blatantly obvious.

by soonergal5 on Oct 18, 2010 2:24 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not just you, OU falls in the same group of teams people either love or hate

Oklahoma, The Cowboys, The Yankees, The Lakers and the Red Wings.
All are consistant winners (except the Cowboys) always in the mix. All play with a swagger ( exept the Cowboys). All are usually the favorites.

ESPN has something against Stoops in my opinion, and I’m not sure why?

by SoonerMike on Oct 18, 2010 3:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I too was getting the feeling

we are the most hated program in college football right now. Even Notre Dame, and USC are getting passes (mostly cause one is rebuilding, and the other is currently being punished)

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com)

by Redhawk on Oct 18, 2010 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hmm interesting question

Might be a good poll question to put up on the site…

"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne

by dishingoutdimes on Oct 18, 2010 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would like to see that poll, and don't just keep on CCMachine

put it all over the net. Then if the results show that ESPIN is trying to sway the voters away from OU, then blat them on Yahoo and every place on the net including in China. Let billions see how creepy they are. Unless of course you have a side gig with ESPIN ;-) , then take the results post and let it die.

by scarab on Oct 18, 2010 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think the sentiment is unique to ESPN

Oklahoma’s debut at #1 left a bad taste in the mouth of anyone who is not a sooner fan. Beating AF and Utah State by a combined 10 points is inexcusable for the team in the driver’s seat on the road to the NCG. Boise state would be be crucified in the human polls given the same schedule and results as OU.

by Xavier Malawi on Oct 18, 2010 10:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

funny

how everyone that is hating on OU forget to mention that OU has beaten 4 teams that were ranked when OU beat them, including Air Force with the number one rushing offense in the country. Including Texas and Florida St.

The argument is it’s better to blow away cup cakes then to beat quality teams. Unless you want think it’s better to LOSE to a quality team and want to back Bama like ESPN is doing as well.

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com)

by Redhawk on Oct 18, 2010 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

There is no factual evidence to back anything you just said.

Just be thankful that pending an Oklahoma or Oregon loss (one of which will probably happen) coupled with no undefeated SEC team you’ll finally get your chance this year.

I don’t want to speak for every OU fan but I personally would love a rematch in Glendale…

by SoonerDutch on Oct 18, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Oh and Brad Edwards

Once again exclaimed that the Sooners do not control our own destiny because the human voters don’t like us. He said that Oregon and Boise had a better shot because they were liked by the pollsters. I’m starting to get a bit of a conspiracy feeling: like ESPN thinks it’s so big now that it can influence voters to lower us in the rankings to allow a Boise State team into the top 2. Ridiculous.

by soonergal5 on Oct 18, 2010 2:19 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Quit worrying about ESPN

If OU wins out, they’re in….end of story. They will remain in the top 2 in the computers and in the top 3 in the human polls at worst. Even with a bias on the part of some at ESPN (Herbstreet and Holtz both say they have OU at 1) the proof is in the current BCS poll. OU’s SOS will be better than any other contender with the possible exception of an undefeated SEC champion. That will, in the end, carry the day.

With that said, our Sooners have to win out.

by Sean Post on Oct 18, 2010 3:10 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm surprised

that Lou Holtz doesn’t have unbeaten Michigan St. as #1 since they did beat his beloved Notre Dame on a fake!

by OnlyOneOU on Oct 19, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

One other point I think should be addressed

There are still those on ESPiN saying Alabame will be back on top eventually because no BCS AQ teams are going to remain undefeated. This is just arrogant assumption. I know it’s going to be tough to run the table without dropping a game, but with Texas out of the way I have to put OU’s chances of finishing undefeated at at least 60% or greater. ( I know some will not agree). OSU and Mizzou should be good tests for this team, but I still would favor OU comforably in every game remaining on the schedule. Alabama may still be the best team in the SEC and the country, so it would be sad to see them (or whoever wins the SEC) lose out to an undefeated Boise State.

by leatherneck1061 on Oct 18, 2010 3:51 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd rather have Boise in then a one loss SEC team

all other conferences would be practically eliminated with one loss. The SEC gets FAR too much credit. (yes, I think they have the best top half of their conference…but still)

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com)

by Redhawk on Oct 18, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem I have with playing Boise

is they are still considered illegitimate by the majority of the college football world and will continue to be so long as they are in the WAC. Beating them would for an NC would be sort of a hollow victory in my opinion. I am sure some will disagree, but I for one would rather play against the best.

by leatherneck1061 on Oct 18, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with you, no BShb St anywhere, except the off the wall non watched creepy cable networks

letting those attention starved red-headed stepchildren into the NC regardless of the record goes to show you that the wussification of America is here and final.

by scarab on Oct 18, 2010 5:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed...

Beating the crap out of Boise would be a sweet victory. They would be everyone’s darling and we would be the bad guys.
But when we did beat Boise, I’m sure the media would proclaim that suddenly Boise wasn’t as good as everyone thought. They would say that we finally won a BCS game, but it was against a non-AQ team; the little guys that shouldn’t have been in the NC game anyhow. (Even though they wanted it so badly). The media would disregard our claim to the NC. That would eventually expand to claim that if we had played a more deserving team, say from the SEC, then we would have lost.
Then Bob Stoops would still be coach who can’t win the big game, because they wouldn’t qualify that game as a big game…it’s a vicious cycle.

by soonergal5 on Oct 18, 2010 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I 100% totally agree with this!

Also, controversy does get people to watch…and creates ratings…..Also it’s good for them to hate on OU

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com)

by Redhawk on Oct 18, 2010 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh goodness...

much like onside kicks, I will forever hate the hook and ladder and iconic marriage proposals from football studs to head cheerleaders…

by soonergal5 on Oct 20, 2010 1:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't want to flame conspiracy theories but

does it bother anyone else that the ones in control of the punditry regarding who makes the championship game is also the one who stands to make money on what the matchup turns out to be?

by SoonerDutch on Oct 18, 2010 4:20 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

yes it does bother me

haven’t you noticed the I despise, I dislike, I hate everything about ESPIN so much I hate their guts and livers!

ESPIN with literally make hundreds of millions of dollars pimping BSh St all year long.

by scarab on Oct 18, 2010 5:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

Easy answer = NO

"I don't like Texas. I don't like the city of Austin. And I don't like the color orange. It reminds me of puke." The Boz

by Jordan Esco on Oct 18, 2010 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

BTW

I don’t read too much into it, but I got onto the ESPN site this afternoon and they had changed the heading from “Error Messages?” to simply “Observe and Report”. They’re playing up the eye test still; trying to play down the computers, but it’s not nearly as obnoxious as it was. :-)

by soonergal5 on Oct 18, 2010 8:09 PM CDT reply actions  

kind of steer it like you want it poll

who do you trust them or the BCS, how about a none of the above on that one.

Polls are worse than stats.

by scarab on Oct 18, 2010 9:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Disney Coverage is directly correlated with

the projected television audience. Whether their pundits are conscious of it or not, the people getting air time are consistently pushing teams that create a bigger TV audience. Generally that means any team from California/Florida/Texas, Notre Dame, then anyone from the SEC or BigTen. Boise State is basically a wild card. On the one hand they could generate a large casual audience, but some people are clearly pushing Boise State, TCU, and Utah as pawns to deligitimize the BCS to foster a playoff or other system.

After the final BCS came out in 2008, ESPN ran a poll question for one day. They asked: “What is your biggest BCS gripe? (a) wrong teams in the title game (b) ohio state selected as an at large selection © I have no gripe.” 48 states and the international vote chose B. Texas chose A. Ohio had no gripe. Literally a plurality of every state except Texas thought the best teams were in the Title game (Florida-Oklahoma). Ohio actually had a plurality of fans say that they had no gripe with the BCS, which is quite an achievement when you think about it. Of course, Texas (the university this time), feeling slighted from being left out of the title game, ultimately showed the world and took out their frustration by rolling to a 3-point win over a team that no other region of the world thought deserved to be there.

I’m sure everyone remembers the ad nauseum coverage of the “controversy” surrounding the BigXII champion, so of course the poll showing that a vast majority of fans willing to take the time to answer the poll thought there was no real controversy lasted one day. I took a screen-grab of it and kept it until my computer was stolen. That computer had a lot of stuff on it, but that screen-grab is probably the only thing I can’t replace. It was too perfect. A plurality of Ohio had no gripe. That’s beautiful.

by BigFatScott on Oct 18, 2010 11:57 PM CDT reply actions  

they do pretty much own all the Bowls

they have a dog in the hunt to keep the Bowl system.

however, they also push certain teams/areas for sure…and ignore others…they never mention Oregon at all…and guess who the Pac10 doesn’t have a contract with?

and while I’m at it…from “Sports Nation” show today: What percentage of the Nation thinks OU is the best team? A: 13%

Colorado Rockies correspondent at My Team Rivals (www.mtrmedia.com/rockies) and my own site Rockies Reporter (www.rockiesreporter.wordpress.com)

by Redhawk on Oct 19, 2010 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

wow, that low?

before the rankings came out I thought OU was a 2 or 3 only because I didn’t want them being the target to hit being ranked a 1. However I do not think they are undeserving of their current ranking position. I hope they make the run to the NC or at least stay at the top for a majority of the weeks left. It would piss me off to no end to lose the ranking due to lOSUr State.

by scarab on Oct 19, 2010 8:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Crimson and Cream Machine! We are a diverse online community who share in a common bond, the Oklahoma Sooners. Make yourself at home by reading, posting and participating in all that we do.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Oklahoma_sooners_small
Navigating the Waters of Football Purgatory

Recent FanPosts

Small
Suspensions: Trey Franks
Small
Summer Months & Predictions
Champ_small
Sooner Wrestlers Qualify for Olympic Team
Suhfasa_small
Detroit lions fan here
Images_small
Order your Austin Wood's "BEAT CANCER" shirt..!!! I got mine!
Funnyface_small
Ideas/Critiques of the New Post Season Format
3416572471_871ee113bb_small
Where's Jamell Fleming?
Xlvchamps_small
OU Spring Game Coverage by FS Oklahoma
Small
Weekend Visitors/Spring Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mattsite__2__small ccmachine

R1-01151-022a_small Jon Woods

Switzer_small Jordan Esco

Profile_small OnlyOneOU

Authors

N9603153_35992066_5059_small Jubanator14

Albert-einstein5_small dishingoutdimes

Small NateHeupel