Fear The Stache But Keep Perspective
There may not be a more famous mustache in the history of OU football than the one covering the lip of Landry Jones. Already recognized by the American Mustache Institute the Landry Jones stache, like other famous Sooner facial hairs, represents more than just a fashion statement.
The Tony Casillas stache of the mid-80's represented the power of an unstoppable force. The Captain Kangaroo like Howard Schnellenberger stache of the mid-90's represented the disappointment of mediocrity. Now in 2009 Oklahoma's newest rendition of the stache represents pride and hope. It's the pride of being Oklahoma and finding a way to overcome adversity and achieve success. It's the hope of the future where a new but proven gunslinger is waiting in the wings of what is now a program with a tradition of award winning quarterbacks

In the words of one of our own readers, "Landry Jones has proven to be more than just a serviceable backup." Jones has completed nearly 61% of his passes for 673 yards and 9 touchdowns (3 Int's) in his two-and-a-half games as Oklahoma's backup. To put some perspective on how well he's played the last few weeks, Florida's Tim Tebow has completed 67% of his passes for 540 yards and 5 touchdowns (1 Int) and Texas' peanut butter and jelly eating Colt McCoy has completed 68% of his passes for 286 yards and 6 touchdowns (4 Int's). As we Okies like to say, "That ain't bad company."
However, while we're talking about perspective let's keep in mind that Landry Jones is Sam Bradford's backup. When comparing Bradford and Jones two words should standout to quell the conversation. The words "Heisman" and "Trophy" carry a lot of weight. Oklahoma needs a healthy Sam Bradford to survive the season. This crazy notion that Sam Bradford should be put on the shelf and OU will be fine without him is just plain...crazy! Sam Bradford, if healthy, needs to be back on the field for the Sooners to attempt to lead them to do what he came back to school to do.
Forget the fear of being injured again as well. That's something that fans talk about but players don't think about. If a football player allows himself to worry about being hurt then he might as well quit playing altogether because he's lost his edge. It's easy to get caught up in a record breaking performance like the one that Landry Jones had on Saturday and forget how accurate of a passer Bradford is. Before his injury he had completed over 71% of his passes with a score and no interceptions.
Oklahoma has some really big games coming up and while Jones has given us some memorable moments we must keep in mind that he led the Sooners to victory over the two weakest opponents on the schedule. We've not seen him play on the road. We've not seen him play in a conference game and we've not seen him play in a big game. There is a lot about Landry Jones that is unknown. Meanwhile Bradford is 1-1 against Texas, 2-0 in Big 12 Championship games and has played for a BCS Championship.
With Miami, Baylor and Texas the next three games on the schedule and road trips to Lawrence, Lincoln and Lubbock looming I want a guy back there that's proven in those types of games. If healthy, Sam Bradford is Oklahoma's best chance at winning and if he's healthy he needs to be on the field a week from Saturday.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Landry Jones
I am impressed with Landry’s performance and potential, especially him being a redshirt freshman. The stache hype is nothing new. I recall seeing a similiar article on BON about Colt’s “pornstache” and wonder who sported the stache first among the two quarterbacks. I’m assuming it’s Jones.
I’m very interested to see how Sam jells with his new reformatted offense when he comes back.
Miami on the road is going to be tough.
prolly Jones, Colt did it to appease his lineman for a few weeks.
by Displaced Longhorn on Sep 25, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions
agreed
We need Sam for the Miami game. (Baylor, not so much.) But it’s great to know that the OU program will be in good shape for next year. I look forward to more great stats from Jones.
I wish he'd shave...
…just so we could eliminate the stache as a topic of conversation.
Who is to say...
…that Jones wouldn’t perform as good or better than Bradford would against Miami?
If Jones is the QB of the future, he’s got to get those tough starts somewhere—why not now?
Disagree...
…I’m not trying to start an argument, but I don’t necessarily agree 100% with your comment. I think until Jones is thrown into a heated battle with a Miami/UT/(INSERT OTHER TEAM) and proves or doesn’t prove his worth, we have to believe that Jones can do just as good as Bradford.
On a side note, Bradford’s stats through his first 3 games in 2007 are phenomenal: 59 for 74 (80%) 11 TDs to 1 INT and 823 yards.
It's Okay To Disagree...That's What This Site Is For
I say let’s wait until next year to throw Landry Jones into a heated battle when Bradford isn’t an option. That is unless Bradford still isn’t ready to go in which he shouldn’t be an option for the Miami game.
Can I just clarify
You think a healthy Sam Bradford isn’t better than Landry Jones?
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!
Clarification
…I am analytical person, so I am coming from that side.
It’s like trying to comparing an established athlete versus someone with no exposure. You can’t for sure say that a new up and coming sprint runner is better/worse than the reigning champion without actually seeing him in action versus a heated opponent. Does that make sense?
Hindsight is always 20-20, but we have no idea what kind of QB Jones will be in a full-years time or several years time. Maybe Jones wins 2 Heisman’s and that makes him better than Bradford. Maybe Jones is mediocre and not better than Bradford…
I understand that there is a chance that Landry Jones could potentially be better than Sam Bradford. We haven’t seen anything to suggest such a bold claim, but there is no way at this point we can definitively say that he isn’t better than Sam, so that possibility is always out there. But to suggest that because we don’t know that Landry Jones, who has started two games at home against weak opponents in his career, isn’t better than Sam Bradford, he deserves to start the Miami game, a top 10 opponent on the road, over a healthy returning Heisman winner, is bizarre.
For an analytical person, I would think it would be easy to figure out why starting Sam Bradford over Landry Jones might give you a better chance to win the game.
If you're so sure of what it ain't, how about telling us what it am!

by 















