Big 12’s Most Embarrassing Non-Conference Games Of 2009

The Colorado Buffaloes travel to play a non-conference game at Toledo
The start of the football season is the one time in which every team is on an even keel as far as records go. Obviously the goal is to keep the perfect record intact for as long as possible which leads to some interesting matchups. Feeding on teams from lesser conferences has long been a practice of the power conferences and the Big 12 is no exception to this. Some of the non-conference games scheduled in `09 for the Big 12 are bad and then some are just down right embarrassing. Here’s a look at the twelve most embarrassing non-conference games scheduled by Big 12 schools.
12.
11.
10.
9. North Dakota @ Texas Tech, September 5th – The Fighting Sioux won six games last season but only beat
8.
7. Northwestern State @ Baylor, September 26th – The Northwestern State Demons finished the 2008 football season with a 7-5 record including an embarrassing 51-6 loss in
6.
5. Furman @ Missouri, September 19th – Furman played Virginia Tech within seventeen points last season, losing 24-7 in
4. Tennessee Tech @ Kansas State, September 26th – Tennessee Tech finished 2008 with a 3-9 record by losing seven games in a row by an average score of 39-17.
3. Northern
2.
1.
* My apologizes to the good people of
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
I take it you are not fond of Div 2 schools
playing Div schools? (and yeah I realize they aren’t called D-1 and D-2 anymore) And…actually I’m not either. But wins must be on the crappiest schools schedules, and Big Schools don’t want to go Home and Away against the smaller D-1 schools anymore, and the smaller D-1 schools don’t want 4 non conference road games
So in comes the Nancies. I’m so glad college football added a 12 game. (that’s sarcasm folks!)
by Redhawk on May 7, 2009 8:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I got no beef against D2
It’s just the Big 12 has no business scheduling against some of these. They would actually accomplish more by scrimmaging against themselves.
by ccmachine on May 7, 2009 10:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I see K-State made it on here twice...
Welcome back, Snyder. :D…:’(
Hail to the Purple, Hail to the White
Wildcat in spirit, Wildcat in fight
Hail Alma Mater from sea to sea
Onward forever, Hail Victory!
by MadCat on May 7, 2009 11:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
patsies
I love the blog, but man I get sick of these articles every year. Yeah, schools have to play cream puffs EVERY year. It’s damn near impossible to schedule D1 schools every year. From what I heard OU was scratching and clawing for one, but had to settle on Idaho St. Same with Chattanooga last year. So what?
Is it ugly? Yeah. Is it avoidable? Not really. It’s not like OU really really really wanted to play Idaho St.
by matty in dallas on May 7, 2009 11:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree on the D-2 bashing
I’m also a graduate of Colorado St. Let’s take a look at it from their side. I’m sure Colorado St, would love to go to a Big 12 school and get a big pay day. But they also have to fill 6 home games (4 from Conf. and 2 out of Conf games) and would love having a big school on their home schedule to sell tickets to. But, the Big 12 schools…don’t want to go to little bitty Colorado State..they just want one way series.
So for awhile the smaller D-1 schools did 2 for ones….2 games on the road for one return game. But that still leads to an imbalanced home schedule for the smaller schools. So What does Colorado St do? They go to the other smaller D-1 schools, and signed long term H/A series with Nevada and Fresno St, and that leaves the big schools having to either play each other, or taking D-2 schools that will play one road game for the cash.
And why not schedule Chattanooga or Idaho St…..they both are sold out games for OU. OU can make more money playing Idaho St once and having another patsy next year in Norman, than going home and away with some team like Colorado St.
by Redhawk on May 7, 2009 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do your research on number 8
I gotta say… that would should not even be on the list. 1) Iowa State is not a very good football team. I’m not saying that to bash them or anything, but they haven’t won much lately. 2) NDSU just came out of 5 years of transition of D-2 to D-1AA where we beat 3 of the 4 D-1A teams we played. They may not be elite programs, but we beat Central Michigan at their place by 30, sneaked out our first one against Ball State, and beat Minnesota 1 of the 2 times we played them (side note we should have one the first one). I’d have to say that Iowa State is right on par with those teams. I’m not saying we will win for sure, but it definately will NOT be embarassing. We have the core of our team coming back… our only question is at the QB spot. Yes we slipped a little last year due to sloppy play, but that season was on the heals of back to back 10-1 seasons.
by NDSUbison on May 7, 2009 1:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would put the entire non-conference schedule for Texas A&M, Tech and UT as your top 3. At least baylor schedules UConn and Wake Forest. OU has miami and BYU. If OSU hadn’t scheduled Georgia, then they should be in the same class as A&M, Tech and UT. Then again, the Big 21 South has not reason to make excuses because conference play is so brutal.
by TXGolfJunkie on May 8, 2009 9:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Colorado Schedule
We aren’t entirely to blame for playing at Toledo. We originally had a home-and-home scheduled with a better MAC team, Miami of Ohio, but they backed out of the game to play Kentucky at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
And we do play at West Virginia. And next year we have Cal and Georgia on the schedule, so at least we try to play decent teams. But everybody wants to schedule cupcakes now, or else those weird neutral site games on tv. Non-conference scheduling is getting ridiculous.
by Buffsrising on May 8, 2009 12:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 









