Big 12’s Most Intriguing Non-Conference Games In 2009
Last week we took a peek at some of the most embarrassing non-conference match-ups for the Big 12 conference and not its time to turn the page and look at the better end of the league’s non-conference schedule. Big 12 schools have scheduled intriguing games against teams from the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Pac 10, SEC and yes, even the Mountain West.
With the criticism often given to Big 12 schools for weak scheduling, accolades are deserved for the following ten games, many of which will make for a strong opening weekend in `09.
10.
9. Missouri/Illinois, September 5th – The “other” boarder way for the Tigers will give us the first look at the post Chase Daniel. This is also the second of two Big 12/Big 10 match-ups on our list indicating that a little conference pride is at stake.
8. Baylor @ Wake
7.
6. Oklahoma/Brigham Young, September 5th – The Sooners get to open up Jerry World with a match up against one of the top teams in the Mountain West. Led by senior quarterback Max Hall, the Cougars will be chasing BCS dreams in `09 while the Sooners begin their quest for a fourth consecutive conference crown and another shot at BCS glory.
5. Kansas State @ UCLA, September 19th – Bill Snyder is back in the saddle in the Little Apple and with the cream puff non-conference schedule that the Wildcats are playing this game sticks out like a sore thumb. The Bruins are long way from being the toast of the Pac 10 conference but they are every bit on par with
4.
3.
2.
1.
1 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Nice run down.
I like the change to something positive for our conference.
"56,000 screaming crazies in The Jones rockin' as it has never rocked before" - Terry Bowden
If you not having fun....then your not playing the game right.
by texastfan on May 14, 2009 4:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dan Hawkins
Great run down, but I have to say, Dan Hawkins is in no danger at CU. The administration loves him, and everybody who matters knows what kind of moonscape Gary Barnett left behind when we fired him(we had, maybe, 50 division I caliber players in 2005, and half of them were the seniors). Add on to the fact that we have no money to buy Hawkins out, and its simple. He’s staying, for at least three more years. We gave Bill McCartney(7 wins in his first 3 years) a long leash, we gave Gary Barnett a pretty long leash(9 wins in his first 2 years with a boatload of talent), heck, we even gave Chuck Fairbanks a long leash(we never did fire him).
by Buffsrising on May 15, 2009 12:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The one thing that can bite him hard
Is the grad rates. They have been so low they are close to hitting the NCAA penalties and those new penalties are rough. i dont think it is all his fault but they are terribly low and he needs to do somthing about it even if it means changing recruiting patterns.
by SoonersNews.com on May 15, 2009 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The grad rates are fine overall
We just had a few guys this last year that transferred out ineligible, like Lynn Katoa and Kendrick Celestine, including a guy who left the program due to concussions(which made it sort of hard to stay in class). But Hawk is recruiting the right kind of players, the right kind of people, and even if we lose a couple of scholarships for a year it won’t be a long-term problem. And honestly, there will have to be a few more players with academic problems to push us below the 925 score. And with the new “accountability groups” Hawk started, off the field issues have pretty much disappeared. Knock on wood!
by Buffsrising on May 15, 2009 5:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sad that Texas didnt make the list.
This isnt me bagging on Texas it is pleading with them. The best teams in our conferrence need to play atleast on non-conference big boy a year. It is not all Texas’s fault as they tried with Arkansas before they went flat in the front but if you schedule one pansy one good team and two decent teams you should be allright. You’re Texas, your pretty damn rich, you dont need to take these fill your schedule with patsies to get a few extra home games here and there.
by SoonersNews.com on May 15, 2009 4:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Texas will never schedule real teams
As long as the fans down there keep buying tickets for bloodbaths, and as long as the state pushes UT to gives games to Texas schools like UTEP, they have no reason to schedule real games.
by Buffsrising on May 15, 2009 5:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No that's not the real reason they won't play anyone
They won’t play anyone cause they suck and they are afraid that if they played a team that is even half decent, like Miami, they might lose.
by subliminalnirvanaist on May 16, 2009 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That will one day bite them in the .....
there will be a time when they get left out of a BCS game because they didn’t have as good as schedule as another team.
Or they lose a big one, and the media will say it’s because they didn’t play good tune up games.
Like SoonersNews.com said, a 4 game non-con should be One good team, One Patsy, and 2 mediocre teams. At least in theory…with scheduling done so far out, you never know where a program will be when the game actually gets played.
by Redhawk on May 16, 2009 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean
like last year?
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on May 17, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
the real reason they won’t play anyone is that Mack Brown knows he caught lightning in a bottle with Vince Young and his chances of winning another national title aren’t that great unless he removes as many obstacles as possible.
There needs to be more in the national media about scheduling, because it’s just bad football.
At least we have VT on our schedule, but the rest is trash. Next year it’s even worse, both set because of the athletic director we fired along with Bill Callahan.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on May 17, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 







