Season Over For Bradford, Sooners Should Start Looking To 2010
While there is nothing substantial that I can link to, all the indications on Bradford's injury is that it's the same type he suffered against BYU and this time he'll not be returning as Oklahoma's signal caller. So it looks as if we've seen the last of Bradford as a Sooner, or have we?
My feelings on his return have changed completely since his initial injury. After the BYU game I had hoped for a best case scenario and that Bradford would be back as quickly as possible, hoping for the Miami game but definitely the Texas game for sure. Now after seeing him go through the same injury for the second time it's clear that he needs rest and most likely surgery to heal properly.
At this point, with a 3-3 record, the season is a wash and its time to start building for next year. While the Texas team we saw today is no where near a national championship caliber squad its unlikely that they're going to drop two games in conference and leave the door open for OU to return to a fourth consecutive conference championship game. It's even more unlikely that the Sooners are going to run the table to even make that type of scenario even possible! It is what it is and it's a down year for OU football.
Oklahoma now has six games left to get a head start on next season. That's six games to get the offensive line to gel and find a replacement for departing senior Trent Williams. Sox games to find a receiver who can catch the ball period, much less in a clutch situation. Six games to get Landry Jones turned into a seasoned veteran so that he can lead the team next year in Bradford's permanent absence. That is if Bradford is going to be absent.
I know, I know, after the way this season has gone he should be also but Bradford isn't really a dollar and cents type of kid. He's having a good time at OU and while all good things must come to an end Sam has made it clear that he'll choose when it does. Some think that he made a mistake by coming back and that should make it a no brainer that he leaves immediately after this nightmare of a season is over, seeing as how we know what's best for him. Personally I think that he'll call it quits at OU and head on to the NFL and I certainly don't blame him for doing so. If you're going to take a beating you might as well be getting paid for it. As I'm ready to thank him for his contributions to the program and wish him the best at the pro level I just can't shake his answer to one question last Tuesday. When asked if he'd like to have a four year career at Oklahoma like his pal Colt McCoy has had at Texas he indicated that it was at least a possibility.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
I feel bad for him
No way he intended his season to go like this. That’s why if I was him, I would opt to sit out the rest of the season and try my luck in the draft.
FIRE BRUCE BOCHY NOW!!!!!!
AND TAKE BRIAN SABEAN WITH HIM!!!!!
by 49er16 on Oct 17, 2009 11:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with ccmachine. . .
. . .if Sam’s going to get beat up he might as well get paid for it. Except for pride and love of his Sooners, everything else he came back for is gone: no NCG, no B12 championship, no BCS bowl, and no Heisman.
Geezus this season sucks so far, but it will be interesting — and insightful — to see what the coaches do next.
by HiDesertSooner on Oct 18, 2009 11:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Time for Sam to get completely healthy and focus on the next chapter of his life. He was stellar for OU and I have no doubt he’ll be stellar as a pro – if he does the smart thing and get that shoulder fixed right.
by Tech92 on Oct 18, 2009 5:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I also agree w/ CC
As painful as it is to have to admit, this year is toast. It’s six games to see where we stand heading into next year. So it’s time to play guys like Ronnell Lewis, Demontre Hurst, Marcus Trice, Jamarkus McFarland, Jaz Reynolds, Dejuan Miller. Why did Miller and Reynolds not even get a chance against Texas? I’m 99% sure Reynolds never got on the field and Miller was only in a for small handful of plays. They threw the fade pass a couple times and I’m forced to ask who on our roster is better for this play that Miller? I had heard speculation on OKC radio that Miller could possibly be used in the flex TE position, similar to what Texas has done w/ Buckner. I was disappointed to see him play well against Baylor and be essentially relegated right back to the bench against Texas. You’re never going to know if a kid and step up and make a big play in a big situation if you never give him a chance.
by jtesooner on Oct 18, 2009 5:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Where are these guys ?
Why are guys like Donald Stephenson, Stephen Good and James Hanna not playing ??? I can’t beleive that Brody Eldrigde is a better guard than Good or Stephenson. Why is James Hanna not starting at TE ?
by josht on Oct 19, 2009 2:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Inconsistent
The part I have trouble with is who the coaches decide to give multiple chances to while not even allowing others onto the field. Good was very highly touted coming out of high school and while that certainly doesn’t equate to anything at this level, I would think that the coaches would at least give him a chance to prove he can’t play. To the best of my knowledge, his playing time this season has been limited at best and while he’s struggled that hasn’t stopped the coaches from continuing to run Cory Brandon out there over and over again. The O-line is probably a bad place to try and make this argument because they’ve all played pretty poorly.
One spot where I feel like we fans have a very legitimate point is at WR. Cam Kenney had his moments against Texas, but that fumble on the reverse was a killer. We saw him get benched against Baylor for dropping passes, yet that fumble somehow didn’t seem to cost him any playing time? I think Miller was on the field for like three snaps with zero balls thrown his way after his best game as a Sooner against Baylor? Wilson’s reason being that Broyles played, in the slot predominately, and that somehow relegated Miller to the bench? And instead of playing Miller flexed out, they decide to go with Trent Ratterree? At least Miller would have been a threat to do something, the same can definitely not be said for Ratterree. Again Wilson’s excuse was the Miller can’t block, so that’s why he used Ratterree instead. Really Kev? Take a look at those rushing stats and tell me that Ratterree made a difference anywhere. Another promising young WR who the coaches refuse to get in the game, Jaz Reynolds. Also coming of a good game against Baylor and what does that earn him, a spot on the bench for literally the entire game.
Well I’m hoping the coaches can accpet the reality of this season and actually start playing some of these kids. Everyone who’s already burned their redshirt needs to be getting significant playing time from here on out. We know what Ryan Reynolds can do, we don’t know what Ronnell Lewis can do. We know what Dom Franks can do, we don’t know what Demontre Hurst can do. We know what Adrian Taylor can do, we don’t know what Jamarkus McFarland can do.
Start using your bench coaches!!! Or you will continue to find yourself in the same position you have for the past several years. A starter goes down, the backup comes in and has virtually no experience, proceeds to get beaten repeatedly, and you come out after the game and tell us that inexperience lead to the break down. Well you’re the only ones preventing these kids from getting that experience. I’ve watched too many games where we’re up big in the 4th quarter and for some inexplicable reason the starters are still in the game (it happend this year against Tulsa) to simply believe that the backups are that bad in practice and that’s why they’re not in there.
by jtesooner on Oct 19, 2009 3:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
asinine
“sooners should look to 2010”
“this year is toast”
So it’s time to play all the freshman and forget about competing at the highest level we can? Screw the upperclassmen who have dilligently earned the right to play? Guess what, if Steven Good or Dejuan Miler or Jaz Reynolds isn’t out there to potentially make a play, it’s PROBABLY BECAUSE THEY AREN’T DOING IT IN PRACTICE EITHER.
This “give-up” attitude pisses me off. Why in the world would you “give up” on the season? There is still a ton to play for. The season is NOT a wash.
How exactly do we “build for next year”? By telling juniors and seniors they get less playing time, leading to less potential developmental time for the NFL? Boy that’s real great for morale. I’m sick of fans who fall in love with these freshman thinking they will come off the bench and somehow magically win games for us. YES let’s take out one of our best LB’s (Reynolds) and put in a freshman (Lewis). How well did that work out for us exactly a year ago? I don’t know if you’ve watched OU games but we’ve seen McFarland and Lewis and Hurst. You are seeing what they can do. To give them a larger role at this point with their inexperience is just folly.
To clarify, I’m NOT against playing freshman, but you play the players who have been the most consisten in practice.
If we want the best possible bowl game, then play the best possible players to get us there. The Oklahoma program deserves that.
by matty in dallas on Oct 20, 2009 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t mean to speak for CC, but I don’t think anyone is advocating “giving up.” Stoops has been notorious for not playing backups during the last couple seasons which has lead to inexperience leading into new seasons. Perfect example, see our offensive line this year. How many games did we wind up winning pretty comfortably last year? Without going back and posting every single final score, I’m going to assume the answer is more than just a handful. Well, I can remember multiple games last year where we’re up big and the entire starting offensive line is in the game late. My question then and now is what’s the point? Why risk the injury to the starters? Why not get the backups some experience? That’s all I’m saying now as well.
I’m definitely not recommending “quitting” on this season, rather trying to get the backups some game experience in meaningful situations. That certainly doesn’t mean you have to bench everyone who isn’t a junior or senior. Just try rotating them into the mix so we don’t go into next year w/ them having zero experience.
As to your point about them not performing in practice, I have to reference our coaches. All we heard throughout summer/fall practice was how well those guys you specifically mentioned. The coaches, namely Kevin Wilson and his comments about the offensive line and the offense in general, are the only ones to blame for any unrealistic expectations we might have. They oversold what they had and now are angry that they’re being questioned after the fact. That said, I find it very hard to believe that the backups we have that never get on the field can’t do just as poorly as some of the guys we currently have out there.
by jtesooner on Oct 20, 2009 6:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 











