Sam Bradford’s Signature Heisman Play
Let’s face it. The Heisman Trophy doesn’t necessarily go to the best player in the country. Instead it usually goes to the player who has the best advertising campaign. While stats are important they really aren’t everything anymore. Voters want to know what your team’s record is and even where they would be without you playing. In other words it is becoming more of a popularity contest for the most valuable player on one of the best teams in the country instead of an award for the actual best player in the country.
Sam Bradford’s stats are eye popping but in today's football it won't be enough.
“We actually haven’t had to do very much,” said Kenny Mossman,
Earlier this week Bob Stoops cited
Tim Tebow broke that mold last season and Sam Bradford should be on his way to setting the trend this year. Tebow had the jump pass last year that everyone saw over and over again which no doubt was on voters minds. This year
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
I don't usually post over here (posted recently but had been a lurker for months previously).
I’m sorry, but all that play shows is Bradford made an ill-advised scramble/jump. First off, it was a 3rd and goal and the QB should always be looking for that TD play no matter what it takes. Sure, he managed to escape that pass rusher and at least made a pump fake (whether it was a decoy or not). However, on that jump, Bradford managed to fumble (luckily for him it went out of bounds, but he basically just let go of it). So, what did Bradford accomplish on the play? He failed to convert a 3rd down for his team and fumbled the ball (out of bounds).
As for the actual Heisman consideration, I’ll say this: The award is meant to determine the Most Valuable Player of the most successful teams on the season. However, most voters just look at stats and hardly ever watch the teams play. With all the playmakers around Bradford, he can hardly be considered the MVP of the team, especially since the team relies so much on the run game. When Texas shut down the run threat of OU, Bradford still had a huge game and lost. If you look at the Texas-TT game and say Colt relied on the run as well, the fact is that Colt was the run game (leading rusher). So, in OU’s only loss on the season (to date) Bradford had a huge game but the team still lost meaning he wasn’t the MVP. Meanwhile, in UT’s only loss on the season Colt was pretty much shut down passing/running (mainly due to dropped balls) and was still able to lead his team on a ‘would-be’ game winning drive before the defense faltered at the end (something Bradford failed to do in his loss). In the end, I’d like to think Colt is more of an MVP than Bradford, but voters will just see stats and probably vote Bradford. So again, this is how I think the Heisman is supposed to be looked at, but the voters undoubtedly see it in a different light.
I see Bradford as more deserving of the O’Brien award rather than the Heisman based on my views above.
As I always mention when posting on opposing teams’ blogs and because many bring it up as accusation anyway, this is an opinion and is therefore biased. Just my view of the incident. I don’t intend to add any more fuel after this initial post either, as this is just meant as an alternate viewpoint to the main post and I have nothing further to say. Let’s just hope most people read the post this far so they don’t respond with questions that aren’t rhetorical.
by HornPossessed on Dec 4, 2008 5:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
At Least You Admit That You Are Biased
What did Bradford accomplish on that play? Hmmmm…let’s see here. He avoided the rush keeping the play alive on third and goal. Chose not to run out of bounds with defenders closing in on him, made a sprint to the end zone when there wasn’t an open receiver and took a big hit while making an effort to get across the goal line. Pretty much looks like he was looking for "that TD play." You sound like you would have given him more credit if he’d run out of bounds, thrown the ball away or made an ill-advised pass.
You are wrong! The Heisman is an award to recognize the best college football player in America and not the MVP of a top team. It isn’t a popularity contest! The argument that Bradford is only putting up numbers because of his surrounding cast is ludicrous. Let’s go ahead and discredit Tom Brady for having Randy moss, Troy Aikman for having, Michael Irvin and Dan Marino for having Mark Clayton. Emmit Smith wasn’t any good because he had a massive offensive line and Barry Sanders, well…he really was the greatest ever. I know I’m comparing pros to college but the point is great players make those around them great and there is no denying Bradford’s greatness.
Seriously, at what point do you guys let go of the 45-35? Bradford has 635 more passing yards and 18 more touchdowns than McCoy and so far he has only thrown the ball 18 more times than McCoy and yet you give McCoy the edge because he beat OU. How is it that Bradford is at fault when the Sooner defense gives up 45 points but McCoy gets a pass when the Texas defense gives up a game winning drive to Tech? Neither quarterback was at fault in the team’s losses.
I’ll give McCoy his due and also would like to point out that he has been more than impressive with his legs this year. He has been the key to the Longhorns success but no more so than Bradford for the Sooners.
by ccmachine on Dec 4, 2008 8:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The Heisman is an award to recognize the best college football player in America and not the MVP of a top team. It isn’t a popularity contest!
ccmachine, if you had not said I would have. That is the first thing I noticed about the original comment. The award has fallen to ‘Hypesman’ status and that is a shame. Is Sam Bradford the ‘best football payer in America’? I don’t know. But one thing for sure is that Cot McCoy is definitely not the best football player in America period. Neither is Tebow. I am sure we could find another payer other than a QB who is just as deserving of the award.
by scarab on Dec 5, 2008 8:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If the award should go to best player in the country it should clearly go to Crabtree. Unfortunately we all know that it doesn’t really go to the best player in the country (See Ty Detmer, Jason White, or Gino Torretta). I always goes to the player on a top 10 team with the most exposure and gaudiest stats. Look at Bush in 2005- his game against Fresno State put him over the top (he was behind prior to it) and he didn’t really perform that well – he just had a ton of kickoff returns because SC kept giving up TD’s and FG’s. He actually only averaged about 20 yards/return which is not at all impressive as the first 18 yards are completely unopposed.
If the coinflip had gone the other way and UT was in the big 12 championship game, McCoy would probably get it. As it is, Bradford will probably get it. There isn’t a real distinction to be made between the two players – Bradford has more passing yards and TD’s but McCoy clearly makes up for it with his rushing and TD’s and superior completion rate. Neither is clearly better than the other in the college game.
by hodad on Dec 5, 2008 10:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 










